PCRLJ 1997

1997 P Cr (PLP)

MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION, NANKANA SAHIB — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1996-August-11
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1997 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION, NANKANA SAHIB — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1997 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1997 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1997 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Petitioner Versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION, NANKANA SAHIB — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Amanullah Khan Niazi for Petitioner

Headnotes / Summary

S. 491

Habeas corpus petition

Arrest of the detenus found detained in the police "'station was not entered in the Daily Diary

No case stood registered against the detenus

Police Officer by taking the law in his own hands had deprived the three detenus of their liberty without any legal justification-- Detenus were ordered to be set at liberty accordingly

Police (officer, however, on account of his unlawful action and highhandedness was burdened with costs of Rs.3,000 to be paid to the detenus.

Judgment & Decree

Respondent in person This is a petition filed by the petitioner under section 491, Cr.P.C. for the recovery of his brother Baber and his relatives Abdul Hafiz and Zafar from the alleged illegal and improper custody of the S.H.O. Police Station Nankana District Sheikhupura and Munir Ahmad, A.S.I. of the said police station. This petition is supported by an affidavit.

2. A Bailiff was deputed. Nusrat Elahi Sheikh, Bailiff submitted in his report that he reached Police Station Nankana Sahib District Sheikhupura on 8 8-1996 at 8-55 p.m. that he found all the three alleged detenus namely Baber, Abdul Hafiz and War in the precinct of the Police Station Nankana Sahib, that he was intimated by the alleged detenus, that they were brought from Canada Colony Nankana Sahib on 1-8-1996 and were under detention that in the Daily Diary of the Police Station Nankana Sahib the arrest of the alleged three detenus was not entered and that no case was registered against them.

3. Today the Police Officers took up the stand that on 8-8-1996 a pistol was recovered from War and Chhuri like dagger was recovered from Abdul Hafiz and that the alleged detenus were produced by the public before the police who were found roaming in Canada Colony in suspicious condition. A photostat of a revolver licence in the name of Muhammad Aslam son of Muhammad Iqbal who is none else than the petitioner of this petition has been produced which is pertaining to the revolver taken into possession by the police. Muhammad Aslam is a resident of Nankana Sahib at present and it can safely be expressed that his revolver was taken into possession by the police. I am tempted to express that Munir Ahmad, A.S.-I. took the law in his hands by arresting the aforesaid three alleged detenus namely Baber, Abdul Hafiz and Zafar without any legal justification. No case stands registered against them and their arrest was not entered in the Daily Diary of Police Station Nankana Sahib when the bailiff reached there. In view of the aforesaid aspect of the matter I hold that Baber, Abdul Hafiz and Zafar were detained by Munir Ahmad, A.S.-I. without legal justification and are declared as the detenus who are allowed to go to a place of their respective choice.

4. Before parting with this petition I have to express that Munir Ahmad, A. S.-I. in violation of law, justice and fair play deprived the aforesaid three released detenus of their liberty. It is a serious matter in an Islamic State to deprive a person of his liberty. Thus, such high-handedness on the part of a Police Officer cannot be ignored who must be burdened with costs as held by me in Criminal Miscellaneous No.475/H of 1994 reported as Abdul Majid v. S.-I./S.H.O. 1995 PCr.LJ

135. As such Munir Ahmad, A.S.-I. is directed to pay costs in the sum of Rs.1,000 to each of the aforesaid three released detenus namely Baber, Abdul Hafiz and Zafar in Court on 13-11-1996 on which date he shall appear personally to do the needful failing which the penal action shall be taken against him. Munir Ahmad, A.S.-I. as well as Muhammad Akram, S.H.O., Police Station Nankana Sahib District Sheikhupura are also warned to be careful in future towards the released detenus in particular and public in general. They shall not tease and vex Muhammad Aslam petitioner, the released detenus and their relatives by taking the vengeance otherwise the law shall take its course afresh against them. An amount of Rs.3,000 has been paid by Munir Ahmad, A.S.-I. to the three released detenus namely Baber, Abdul Hafiz and Zafar and each of them has received Rs.1,000.

2. Both the Police Officers have been directed not to wreck any vengeance against Muhammad Aslam petitioner as well as the released detenus. The licensed revolver has been returned to Muhammad Aslam petitioner. This petition stands disposed of N.H.Q./M-227/L Petition allowed