SCMR 2019

2019 PLP 1914 (SCMR)

HUSNAIN MUSTAFA — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Criminal Petition No. 716 of 2019, decided on 12th September, 2019.
Honorable Judges
Mushir Alam and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2019 PLP 1914 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Mushir Alam and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ
Parties HUSNAIN MUSTAFA — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2019 PLP 1914 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2019 PLP 1914 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Mushir Alam and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2019 PLP 1914 (SCMR) (HUSNAIN MUSTAFA — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Ms. Bushra Qamar, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

(Against the impugned order dated 13.6.2019 passed by the Lahore High Court Lahore in Criminal Misc. No. 14549-B of 2019)

S. 497(2)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302

Qatl-i-amd

Bail, grant of

Case of further inquiry

Polygraph test

Transposing co-accused as prosecution witness

Accused was alleged to have committed murder of two minor children of the complainant

Complainant exonerated his former wife who was also arrayed as accused initially

Effect

Complainant was not an eye-witness of the crime and his initial belief that accused in connivance with his former wife had murdered the children was structured upon a suspicion

Complainant recalled before Trial Court substantial portion of his allegation while exonerating his former wife identically placed and subsequently inducted another co-accused who allegedly participated in the crime and that co-accused was also on bail

Polygraph test, a modern forensic method to unearth truth could establish a person's capacity to lie, however, findings thereof, could not be equated with admission of guilt

Transposition of former wife as a witness with her failure to prosecute accused through private complaint constituted her departure from the scene and as such brought the case within the ambit of S. 497(2), Cr.P.C.

Statements of two prosecution witnesses recorded after an unexplained, inordinate delay also required evidential verification during trial

Horrors of a heinous crime could not impede release of accused on bail, if otherwise his guilt called for further probe nor bail could be withheld as a strategy for punishment

Bail was allowed in circumstances. Muhammad Jaffar, D.P.G. Punjab, Akram and Tanvir, Sub-Inspectors for the State.

Judgment & Decree

QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.

Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen, 9/10, Kaniz Fatima, 7/8 and Muhammad Ibrahim, 4/5 were living with their mother Aneeqa Rasheed after termination of her marriage with their father Qaisar Amin, shifted at Karachi for good; on 24-3-2018, he learnt about homicidal deaths of his children in the residential flat of his former wife; he rushed to Lahore and lodged a report wherein he blamed Aneeqa Rasheed and Husnain Mustafa, present petitioner, to have killed the children; he maintained that his former wife was carrying on with the petitioner and they wanted to get rid of the children, seemingly an obstruction in their affair. As the investigation progressed, the first Investigating Officer let off the petitioner albeit with finding of his liaison with Aneeqa Rasheed; after change of investigation, however, the petitioner alongside Aneeqa Rasheed and Ayyaz Mehmood were sent to face trial; subsequently, the complainant exonerated Aneeqa Rasheed; she was released on bail on the basis of a concessionary statement made by no other than the complainant himself; it was subsequent thereto that she instituted a private complaint against the petitioner and Ayyaz Mehmood co-accused wherein she blamed both of them to have committed the murders within her view; she also contradicted the case set up in the crime report by accusing the police to have collaborated with the accused; unimpressed by the position taken by Aneeqa Rasheed, learned Additional Sessions Judge, after recording precursory evidence, dismissed the complaint vide order dated 23-5-2019. In this backdrop, prosecution case is structured upon a positive polygraph test of the petitioner alongside statements of Muhammad Waseem Abbas and Ali Zaib recorded as late as on 9-7-2018; they claimed to have seen the petitioner on the crime scene in the morning of 24-3-2018; the complainant arrayed Ayyaz Mudassir as privy to the crime in supplementary statement dated 10-7-2018.

2. Heard.

3. Brutality inflicted upon the innocent souls is most appalling to say the least, however, in the chequered circumstances of the case, what cannot be lost sight of is that the complainant, though most grievously aggrieved and devastated, nonetheless, is not eye-witness of the crime; his initial belief that the petitioner in connivance with his former wife murdered the children is essentially structured upon a suspicion; he has even recalled a substantial portion thereof while exonerating identically placed Aneeqa Rasheed before a learned Additional Sessions Judge at Lahore on 19-12-2018. Subsequently inducted co-accused Ayyaz Mehmood, with alleged active participation in the crime is on bail. Polygraph test, a modern forensic method to unearth the truth, may establish a person's capacity to lie, however, findings thereof, cannot be equated with admission of guilt. Transposition of Aneeqa Rasheed as a witness with her failure to prosecute the petitioner through a private complaint constitutes her departure from the scene and as such squarely brings his case within the ambit of subsection (2) of section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. Statements of Waseem Abbas and Ali Zaib recorded after an unexplained, inordinate delay also require evidential verification during the trial. Horrors of an heinous crime cannot impede release of accused on bail, if otherwise his guilt called for further probe nor bail can be withheld as a strategy for punishment. The petition is converted into an appeal and allowed; petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond in the sum of Rs.500,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. MH/H-8/SC Bail granted.