2026 PLP 531 (PTD)
MAMOON ASLAM Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
| Citation | 2026 PLP 531 (PTD) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Tax Ombudsman |
| Bench Members | M. Zafar-ul-Haq Hijazi, Federal Tax Ombudsman |
| Parties | MAMOON ASLAM Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD |
| Primary Law | Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2026 PLP 531 (PTD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2026 PLP 531 (PTD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Tax Ombudsman bench comprising: M. Zafar-ul-Haq Hijazi, Federal Tax Ombudsman.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2026 PLP 531 (PTD) (MAMOON ASLAM Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 2(3)(i)
Fake NTNs , issuance of
Scope
Alleged irregularities in registration process of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) entailed the implications that the new manually issued NTNs might be misused to avail tax relief at reduced rate especially in case of property registration , and that the number of non-filers kept swelling because such newly registered persons might not be bona fide filers
It was found that out of 65 manually registered new cases in RTO, Multan 38 taxpayers did have one or more SIMs in their name as verified from online available website
Further, in said 65 newly issued NTNs, 51 registered persons belonged to jurisdiction of RTO, Multan and had been registered by using user ID of officer / official working in RTO, Multan and the remaining 14 had been registered by using ID of officers of other RTOs
Most of said newly registered persons were filers and there was every likelihood that they were registered to avail the benefit of reduced regime of withholding taxes especially for registration of immovable property
Findings of Federal Tax Ombudsman were that, in view of likely leakage of state revenue, the issue required further probe by the Field Formations because such registrations had been made in violation of Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) laid down by the FBR for registration of taxpayers linking it with mandatory incorporation of SIM numbers; maladministration in terms of section 2(3)(i) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 was clearly visible
Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended FBR to (i) direct the DG (DT & IT), FBR and PRAL authorities at Islamabad to carry out a thorough investigation of the data of recent manually registered persons by the Field Formations in order to forestall any Revenue leakages; (ii) Departmental officers involved in by passing FBR's SOP needed to be identified and taken to the task
Complaint was allowed accordingly. Dr. Khalid Ahmad, Advisor, Dealing Officer. Muhammad Tanvir Akhtar, Advisor, Appraisement Officer. Complainant in person Authorized Representative.
Judgment & Decree
"Following the recent update in which the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) made it mandatory for new taxpayer registrations to be verified only through the registered mobile number linked to the applicant's CNIC. Certain individuals have found ways to bypass this verification process. In several cases I reviewed, the taxpayers' registration forms (Form 181) show the "Medium" as "Manual", indicating that these NTNs were not generated through the normal online process but instead created through internal FBR access possibly from within Regional Tax Offices (RTOs) or PRAL back offices. It is reported that some individuals are exploiting this loophole, charging thousands of rupees per case to manually create NTNs without proper SIM verification. This practice undermines the integrity of the taxpayer registration system and damages public trust in FBR's digital reforms. I strongly urge FBR to investigate this matter, identify the persons involved in this malpractice, and take immediate action to close any system loopholes that allow manual creation of NTNs without proper verification"
2. The complaint was referred to the Secretary Revenue Division, for comments, in terms of Section 10(4) of the FTO Ordinance read with Section 9(1) of the Federal Ombudsmen Institutional Reforms Act, 2013. In response thereto, the Chief Commissioner-IR, RTO, Bahawalpur forwarded Para-wise comments of the Incharge NTN Cell dated 23.10.2025 vide letter dated 28.10.2025, contending that no NTN has been issued manually from RTO Bahawalpur. The form of registration (under section 181) of Khalid Rehman vide number 2160477503295 attached with complaint does not pertain to RIO Bahawalpur. Online verification of registration number shows that jurisdiction of the said registration number pertains to RTO, Peshawar. In this regard the Chief Commissioner-IR, RTO, Peshawar forwarded comments of Assistant commissioner (IR) dated 04.11.2025 vide letter dated 04.11.2025 contending that the concerned unit incharge has requested Manager PRAL, RIO Peshawar vide letter dated 03.11.2025 for provision of login information of the officer whose login was used for the said manual registration. Later on CIR, D.I. Khan Zone, RTO Peshawar has recommended to refer the matter to Member I.T. (FBR) to identify delinquent officer.
3. The Database Administrator, RTO, Multan was called in to join the proceedings. He was asked to provide list of new manually registered taxpayers in order to find out whether the SOP for issuance of new NTNs is being observed or not. He provided a list of 65 manually registered cases during the month of Nov, 2025 within the jurisdiction of RTO Multan as a sample. It was found that these cases have been registered manually from the login of Departmental Officers without following the latest SOP for the registration of new NTN.
4. During the course of investigation proceedings, the Complainant requested to withdraw his complaint vide email dated 17.12.2025. However, since the alleged issuance of fake NTNs entails the following implications, the investigation proceedings were continued. (i) The new manually issued NTNs may be misused to avail tax relief at reduced rate especially in case of property registration. (ii) The number of non-filers keep swelling because such newly registered persons may not be bona fide filers.
5. The CCIR, RTO Multan was required to look into the matter and it was found that out of 65 manually registered new cases in RTO, Multan 38 taxpayers did have one or more SIMs in their name as verified from online available website. Further, in these 65 newly issued NTNs, 51 registered persons belong to jurisdiction of RTO, Multan and have been registered by using user ID of officer / official working in RTO, Multan and the remaining 14 have been registered by using ID of officers of other RTOs. Most of these newly registered persons are filers and there is every likelihood that they were registered to avail the benefit of reduced regime of withholding taxes especially for registration of immovable property. FINDINGS:
6. In view of likely leakage of state revenue, the issue requires further probe by the Field Formations because such registrations have been made in violation of Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) laid down by the FBR for registration of taxpayers linking it with mandatory incorporation of SIM numbers. Maladministration in terms of section 2(3)(i) i.e. "a decision, process recommendation, act of omission or commission which- (a) is contrary to law, rules or regulations or is a departure from established practice or procedure, unless it is bona fide and for valid reasons;" is clearly visible. RECOMMENDATIONS:
7. FBR to - (i) direct the DG (DT and IT), FBR and PRAL authorities at Islamabad to carry out a thorough investigation of the DATA of recent manually registered persons by the Field Formations in order to forestall any Revenue leakages; (ii) Departmental officers involved in bye-passing FBR,s SOP need to be identified and taken to the task; and (iii) report compliance within 30 days. MQ/2/FTO Complaint allowed.