YLR 2011

2011 PLP 1095 (YLR)

ABU SALEH — Petitioner Versus LEARNED IIND CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BADIN

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal , Miscellaneous Application No.S-24 of 2011, decided on 17th January, 2011.
Honorable Judges
Munib Akhtar, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2011 PLP 1095 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Munib Akhtar, J
Parties ABU SALEH — Petitioner Versus LEARNED IIND CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BADIN
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP 1095 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP 1095 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Munib Akhtar, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP 1095 (YLR) (ABU SALEH — Petitioner Versus LEARNED IIND CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BADIN). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 523 & 550

Seizure of vehicle suspected to be stolen

Application for delivery of vehicle

Applicant who claimed to be owner of seized property had stated that without any cause, his vehicle had been taken into custody by the Police under S.550, Cr.P.C.

Counsel for applicant had stated that application was made under S.523; Cr.P.C. for immediate release of vehicle; and that proper registration documents in original, which were in possession of the applicant, were shown to the Magistrate; that Magistrate instead of considering the same, dismissed the application on the ground that proper verification from the Excise and Taxation Department, was awaited

Deputy Prosecutor-General had stated that proper course would to have said verification to confirm that the applicant was true owner of the vehicle

Impugned order was set aside and applicant was directed to appear before the Magistrate

Lt case the police were unable to specify the reasons as to why they suspected that vehicle was stolen or otherwise involved in commission of any offence; and on perusal of original Registration Book of the vehicle; the Magistrate was prima facie satisfied that vehicle was not involved in any crime; or was stolen property; and that prima facie it belonged to the applicant, he would make appropriate order under S.523, Cr.P.C. for interim release of the vehicle to the applicant, pending final confirmation from Excise and Taxation Department. M. Sachal R. Awan for Applicant. Syed Meeral Shah Deputy Prosecutor-General.

Judgment & Decree

MUNIB AKHTAR, J.

Learned counsel states that the applicant is owner of Suzuki vehicle bearing Registration No.KR-3452 and without any cause his vehicle has been taken into custody by the police under section 550, Cr.P.C. Learned counsel states that the application was made under section 523, Cr.P.C. for immediate release of the car, and proper registration documents in original, which were and continue to be in possession of the applicant, were shown to learned Magistrate. He, instead of considering the same dismissed the application on the ground that proper verification from the Excise and Taxation Department, Motor Registration Wing is still awaited. Learned counsel states that this is contrary to law since there was no cause for continuous retention of his car. Learned Deputy Prosecutor-General states that proper course would be for due verification to confirm that the applicant is true owner of the vehicle for which purpose the report of Excise and Taxation Department, Motor Registration Wing is necessary and that therefore, the Magistrate had correctly made the impugned order. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. In my view it is appropriate to set aside the impugned order dated 22-12-2010 and direct the applicant as also S.H.O. A Police Station Badin to appear before the learned Magistrate concerned. In case the police are unable to specify the reasons why they suspect that the vehicle was stolen or otherwise involved in commission of any offence, and on perusal of original registration book of the motor vehicle which shall be produced by the applicant, the learned Magistrate is prima facie satisfied that the vehicle was not involved in any crime nor is it stolen property and that prima facie it belongs to the applicant he shall make appropriate order under section 523, Cr.P.C. for interim release of tile motor vehicle to the applicant pending final confirmation from the Excise and Taxation Department Motor Registration Wing. Let copy of this order be sent to S.H.O. Police Station Badin so that he shall be in attendance before the Magistrate on 20-1-2011, copy of this order may also be sent to Excise and Taxation Department Motor Registration Wing with direction to positively provide the particulars of Car bearing Registration No. KR-3452, Engine No. PKT195206 Chassis No.SR-308PK299866, Owner name Abu Saleh having his address at Shop No. 819 Naseerabad Colony Pipri Karachi. The Excise and Taxation Department Motor Registration Wing is warned that if there is any delay in submitting the necessary report to the learned IInd Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate Badin as above, strict action shall be taken against all concerned in accordance with law. Once the report from the Registration Authority has' been received, the learned Magistrate shall make such order disposing of the matter before him as is warranted. This Criminal Miscellaneous Application stands disposed of. H.B.T./A-21/K Order accordingly.