SCMR 2021

2021 PLP 863 (SCMR)

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chairperson and others — Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Education and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
C.M.A. No.4821 of 2018 in S.M.C. No.01 of 2014 and C.M.A. No.516 of 2019 in Constitutional Petition No.62 of 2017 and Constitutional Petitions Nos.62 and 63 of 2017, decided on 15th February, 2021.
Honorable Judges
Gulzar Ahmed, C.J., Ijaz ul Ahsan and Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2021 PLP 863 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Gulzar Ahmed, C.J., Ijaz ul Ahsan and Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, JJ
Parties HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chairperson and others — Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Education and others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2021 PLP 863 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2021 PLP 863 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Gulzar Ahmed, C.J., Ijaz ul Ahsan and Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2021 PLP 863 (SCMR) (HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chairperson and others — Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Education and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan

Representation

  • ----Art. 184(3)---Matter regarding reconstruction and restoration of Hindu temples---Issues including payment to Hindu Council for restoration of Samadhi shrine in Karak; criminal cases against persons accused of causing damage to Samadhi shrine; restoration of Prahlad mandir in Multan; management of Katas Raj temple by Provincial Government; and details of properties leased out by the Evacuee Trust Property Board---Supreme Court gave directions to relevant functionaries, and sought compliance reports from others to be made available on next date of hearing, to address the issues highlighted.
  • M. Ikram Ch., Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Dr. Aamir Ahmed, Chairman ETPB and Tariq Khan Wazir, Additional Secy., (Shrines) ETPB for ETPB.
  • Iftikhar Ahmed, S.O. Ministry of Religious Affairs, Sohail Aijaz, Dy. Director Litigation Ministry of Federal Education and M. Rafiq Tahir, J.E.A. Ministry of Federal Education, Kamran Murtaza, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (via video-link from Quetta) and Peter Jacob, E.D. CSJ/Chairperson PCMR for Federal Department.
  • 2. As regards the criminal cases initiated against the persons who are alleged to have caused damage to the Samadhi in Karak, it is stated by Mr. Kamran Murtaza, learned Sr.ASC appearing before us through video link from Quetta that the cases are not proceeding before the criminal Courts and on this account the arrested persons are facing difficulties. On this, the learned Advocate General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has stated that there is no obstruction from the side of KP Government for proceeding with the cases of arrested persons and that the cases are being proceeded. He however makes a statement that he will seek instructions with regard to the complaint made and ensure that the cases are proceeded expeditiously. In view of such statement made by the learned Advocate General, KP the learned counsel (Mr. Kamran Murtaza) for the arrested persons states that his above query stands satisfied.

Headnotes / Summary

In Attendance: Sohail Mehmood, Additional A.G.P., Shoaib Suddle, Chairman of Commission, M. Saqib Jillani, Member of Commission and Dr. Ramesh Kumar, Member of Commission. M. Ikram Ch., Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Dr. Aamir Ahmed, Chairman ETPB and Tariq Khan Wazir, Additional Secy., (Shrines) ETPB for ETPB. Shumail Ahmed Butt, A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Qasim Niaz, Chief Secy., Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, M. Rafiq, Additional Assistant Commissioner, Kohat, Tayyab Khan, RPO, Kohat and M. Naeem, Deputy Secretary, H.E., Khyber Pakhtunkhwa for Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Ch. Faisal Fareed, Additional A.G. Punjab, Ibad Ullah Sajid, Social Welfare Officer, Government of Punjab, Mian Zahid Mehrnood, Law Officer, H.R. Punjab, Rizwana Naveed, Additional Secy., H.R. Punjab, Amir Riaz, Director, PCTB, Lahore, Dr. Sohail Sarwar, Deputy Director, PCTB, Lahore, Shehzad Manzoor, DSP, Multan and Wajid Ullah Kundi, Secretary I&C, Punjab for Government of Punjab. Niaz Ullah Niazi, A.G. Islamabad for ICT. Ayaz Khan Swati, Additional A.G., Balochistan for Government of Balochistan. Iftikhar Ahmed, S.O. Ministry of Religious Affairs, Sohail Aijaz, Dy. Director Litigation Ministry of Federal Education and M. Rafiq Tahir, J.E.A. Ministry of Federal Education, Kamran Murtaza, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (via video-link from Quetta) and Peter Jacob, E.D. CSJ/Chairperson PCMR for Federal Department. Ms. Leela Kalpana, Additional A. G. Sindh (via video-link from Karachi) and Abdul Hadi, Secretary Minorities Affairs, Sindh (via video-link from Karachi) for Government of Sindh.

Judgment & Decree

In our last order dated 08.02.2021, there is a reference of Rupees Thirty Eight Million to be paid to Pakistan Hindu Council by the Evacuee Trust Property Board ("ETPB"). It is stated that an amount of Rupees Two Million has already been paid by Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa for reconstruction of the Samadhi at Karak. So far the claim of Dr. Romesh Kumar for payment of Rs.38 million by the ETPB is concerned, it is stated by the learned Additional Attorney General as well as learned ASC for the ETPB that no account has been submitted by the Hindu Council in response of said claim and that in case the Hindu Council submits the account of such amount of Rs.38 million, the ETPB shall consider the same and deal with it appropriately and in case any amount is due to be paid by the ETPB to Hindu Council, the same shall be paid. In this view of the matter, Dr. Ramesh Kumar may submit appropriate accounts to the Chairman, ETPB.

2. As regards the criminal cases initiated against the persons who are alleged to have caused damage to the Samadhi in Karak, it is stated by Mr. Kamran Murtaza, learned Sr.ASC appearing before us through video link from Quetta that the cases are not proceeding before the criminal Courts and on this account the arrested persons are facing difficulties. On this, the learned Advocate General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has stated that there is no obstruction from the side of KP Government for proceeding with the cases of arrested persons and that the cases are being proceeded. He however makes a statement that he will seek instructions with regard to the complaint made and ensure that the cases are proceeded expeditiously. In view of such statement made by the learned Advocate General, KP the learned counsel (Mr. Kamran Murtaza) for the arrested persons states that his above query stands satisfied.

3. So far Prahlad Mandir at Multan is concerned, no satisfactory report has been received from the Government of Punjab and even the Chief Secretary, Punjab is not in attendance despite the fact that it was directed to him to ensure that restoration of the Mandir is made in order to facilitate Hindu Community of Pakistan to hold Holi festivals in said Mandir on 28th March of 2021.

4. Once the Court had passed an order, it was the duty of the Chief Secretary, Punjab to ensure its compliance. We note that despite meeting of the 'One Man Commission' appointed by this Court with the Chief Secretary, Punjab so also by Dr. Romesh Kumar nothing has been done by the Chief Secretary and this Court takes serious note of such conduct of the Chief Secretary, Punjab. In the circumstances, the Chief Secretary, Punjab is directed to ensure that compliance of this Court's order dated 08.02.2021 is made in letter and spirit and such compliance report be submitted before this Court on the next date of hearing, when the Chief Secretary, Punjab shall also be in attendance. Two weeks' time is granted for this purpose.

5. Mr. Muhammad Ikram Chaudhry, learned ASC appearing for the ETPB- states that through notification dated 12.06.2006 management of Katas Raj Temple Complex in District Chakwal was transferred by the Federal Government to the Provincial Government Punjab for its maintenance with immediate effect and until further orders. We are informed that the maintenance which was required to be made in the year 2006 has already been done by the Punjab Government and now the purpose of said notification dated 12.06.2006 stands served and Katas Raj Temple Complex in District. Chakwal has to be reverted back to the ETPB. In this regard, let Federal Government issue necessary notification(s) and ensure that Katas Raj Temple Complex in District Chakwal is returned back to the ETPB to be dealt with under the Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975. Such an exercise will be completed by the Federal Government within a period of two weeks.

6. A report has been submitted on behalf of Secretary, Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training which is not signed by the Secretary himself rather it is signed by Deputy Director (Literacy) of said Ministry. Such report is not in compliance of our order dated 08.02.2021 and as such the same is returned with direction to the Secretary, Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training to submit a report duly signed by him to the Court and he shall also be in attendance on the next date of hearing. The report shall be made available by him within a period of two weeks.

7. The Chairman, ETPB has handed over to the learned 'One Man Commission' in Court a USB Drive containing full details of all Evacuee Trust Properties as well as details of all Mandirs, Samadhies and Gurdawaras, etc. The learned 'One Man Commission' shall examine such material contained in the USB as supplied to him by the Chairman ETPB and thereafter, if deemed necessary, submit his response to the same.

8. However, the Chairman, ETPB has been informed that none of the properties of the ETPB can be utilized by the Board for its own employees nor the same can be sold out/transferred to any person and in case leases of such properties have been made, the Chairman shall give full details of the same as well as the amounts which the Board is receiving from the lessees. He shall also in the report mention the rates which were initially fixed as lease amounts and the present rates of lease amounts which are being paid to the ETPB by the lessees. The duration of the leases shall also be indicated from the initial stages uptill now and the persons to whom such leases have been granted. This report shall be made available by the Chairman, ETPB to this Court within a period of two weeks and he shall also be in attendance before us on the next date of hearing. Adjourned to a date in office after two weeks. MWA/H-4/SC Order accordingly.