YLR 2011

2011 PLP 955 (YLR)

HADI BUX — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER and 3 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No. S-1801 of 2010, decided on 5th November, 2010.
Honorable Judges
Syed Zakir Hussain, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2011 PLP 955 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Syed Zakir Hussain, J
Parties HADI BUX — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER and 3 others — Respondents
Primary Law Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP 955 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP 955 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Syed Zakir Hussain, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP 955 (YLR) (HADI BUX — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICER and 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Representation

  • Nisar Ahmed Ghulam Hyder Abro for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 302

Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199

Constitutional petition

Qatl-e- amd

Petitioner, complainant of F.I.R., sought arrest of Police officials nominated in the F.I.R.

Validity

Purpose of F.I.R. registered on the prima facie fair statement of the complainant was frustrated by dishonest investigation of the Investigating Officer who recorded statements of prosecution witnesses and the complainant and submitted the report `C' class

Persons produced as witnesses could not be believed to have made statements denying the commission of any offence at all

Inaction and indifference of Police high-ups to murders committed by Police officials under the garb of Police encounters was beyond the pale

Police officials involved in killing had to be treated like other murderers

Case was destroyed by the Investigating Officer and the other officers who acted on his opinion leading to submission of challan in `C' class

`C' class report submitted by the Police before Judicial Magistrate was rejected/recalled for not being fair--Investigating Officer was directed to arrest the S.H.O. Police nominated in the F.I.R. and hand over his custody along with case record to the Deputy Superintendent Police who was appointed new Investigating Officer of the case

Order accordingly. Azizul Haq Solangi Asstt: A.-G. along with SIP Syed Fakharuddin I.O. and accused SIP Imam Bux Lashari.

Judgment & Decree

SYED ZAKIR HUSSAIN, J.

The police has submitted the report in `C' Class in the matter of Crime No.47 of 2010 of ' Police Station Aakil. It is an admitted position that the nominated accused were not subjected to arrest, interrogation and investigation. The S.H.O. of the same Police Station is one of the nominated accused and the others are working under his subordination therein despite registration of the case of the heinous crime which is strange and scandalous to the interest of the State for the reason that the purpose of registration of F.I.R. for and on behalf of the State on the basis of the statement of the complainant which is prima facie fair, appears to have been frustrated by the police particularly the I.O. of the case by dishonest investigation, which includes recording of statements of P.Ws. of the complainant and submission of the report of `C' Class. It is hard to disgust that the persons produced as witnesses by the complainant of the crime in question would have given the evidence of no crime which is against the very purpose of their production. The case of like nature needs significant attention as the same involves highhandedness of the police officials which serve no interest of the State rather it is a source of injustice and bringing bad name to the State. This is also surprising to note that the DPO and DIG concerned did not take nay personal interest towards fair and impartial investigation of the crime, although by virtue of registration of the F.I.R. within their official domain, they were bound by their duty and law to ensure such fairness. It is also a matter of great concern that normally in cases of murder under garb of police encounter by the subordinate police officials, the high-ups such as DPO, DIG and RPO etc. seem to be playing role of silent spectators and they do not bother to hold enquiry at their own level just to ensure that the encounter was fair and there was no excess or highhandedness on the part of their subordinates and such conduct can hardly be appreciated as duties towards public at large. The police officials are not to kill the people, they are bound to protect people and law is meant to protect people as well and where a police official is found involved in killing, he is also to be dealt with similarly as that of a normal murdered but with exception which is provided in law if he is found to have acted bona fide or in good faith and in otherwise case, he is to be subjected to criminal action like other people. In the instant case the investigation, as I have stated above is not fair and the complainant is present in Court and crying publicly that despite registration of the F.I.R. and gearing up the machinery of criminal justice system he has failed to finally get productive result and the case has been cut at its root in the first instance by the I.O. and officers who have acted upon his opinion which culminated in submission of the challan in 'C' Class, as stated above. By consent, `C' Class report, submitted by the police in the case before learned Incharge Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Larkana, is called for being not fair and the investigation is handed over to Anwar Ali Gopang, DSP Headquarter Shikarpur. The present I.O. SIP Syed Fakharuddin Rashdi is directed to arrest the nominated accused SIP Imam Bux Lashari S.H.O. Police Station Aakil, in the case, and hand over his custody along with the necessary case papers to the appointed I.O. named above, who will record the statements of the witnesses of the complainant independently with free and fair investigation and then charge sheet the nominated accused before the Court of law and report compliance. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms. A.R.K./H-29/K Order accordingly.