1999 PLP 2579 (MLD)
M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 3 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1999 PLP 2579 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 3 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 2579 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 2579 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 2579 (MLD) (M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE---Petitioner
- Petitioner, an advocate of this Court has filed this petition under Article 199 of the Constitution with the following prayer:--
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.144
Ban on celebration of "Basanat" festival and manufacturing and flying of kites was sought on the basis of morality and desirability
Constitutional petition
Maintainability-- Petitioner had prayed for prohibiting celebration of "Basant" festival and manufacturing and flying of kites which endangered public peace and tranquillity, and totally un-Islamic, illegal and unlawful tradition and custom of Hindu religion
Celebration of "Basanat" festival was part of cultural tradition and in absence of any law prohibiting celebration of cultural functions, celebration of Basant could not be prohibited
No doubt as a consequence of kite flying, which was normally accompanied with air firing, many deaths were caused every year and many persons were seriously injured and due to noise caused by firing, drum beating and playing of video in full pitch, peace and tranquillity of neighbourhood was disturbed and many patients and students had to forego rest and studies, but remedy of all that did not lie in judiciary restraining all those things
Remedy lay in developing civil sense coupled with strict enforcement of provisions of law through Ordinance as well as directions issued under S.144, Cr.P.C.
If such measures did not show desired result, remedy, thereafter, could be in Legislature making some law on the subject and thereafter, in enforcing same
High Court, in state of law as it was, could not restrain citizens from either celebrating or manufacturing and selling kites and other materials
Petitioner had not contended that his life, was in any manner, in danger by absence of law in respect of celebration of Basant
Contentions of petitioner were in realm of morality and desirability and it was not proper for High Court to enter into field of morality and desirability in exercise of jurisdiction under Art. 199 of Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
Contention that very celebration of festivity of "Basant" was un-Islamic under Constitution of Pakistan (1973), could only be examined by Federal Shariat Court-- Constitutional petition was disposed of with observations that Government would attend to illegalities accompanying festivity of "Basant" and take steps to effectively deal with the same.
Judgment & Decree
Petitioner in person. Petitioner, an advocate of this Court has filed this petition under Article 199 of the Constitution with the following prayer:-- "that respondents may graciously be directed to ban the carnival of ' Basant' and kite manufacturing and kite flying totally being un -Islamic, illegal, unlawful tradition and customs of Hindus endangering the public peace and tranquillity. Respondents Nos.1 and 3 may also be directed to enact the law banning the manufacturing the flying kites on 'Basant' or any other day, firing in the air causing nuisance to the public and exposing youngsters and other citizens to safety hazards, electricity breakdown and to enforce the same strictly without any discrimination or delay. It is further prayed that pending the decision of this writ petition respondents Nos.1, 2 and 4 may kindly be directed to take effective measures to ban and stop the celebration of Basant and kite-flying and the nuisance caused thereby forthwith. "
2. The comments of respondent No.1 are on file, wherein it is stated that the respondent-Government is taking adequate measures to check firing in the air and display of fire-arms and for this purpose District Magistrates have been issuing necessary restrictive orders under section 144, Cr.P.C.
3. It was put to learned counsel that celebration of Basant is part of cultural tradition and how can this Court prohibit its celebration unless the learned counsel was to show that the celebration of the .same was prohibited under law or was, in any manner, in conflict with a letter of law. Clearly there is no law in field prohibiting the celebration of cultural functions. It was, however, contended by the petitioner that as a consequence of kite-flying, which is normally accompanied with air firing, many deaths are caused every, year and P many persons are seriously injured. He also stated that due to noise caused by firing, drum beating and playing of video in full pitch, the peace and tranquillity of the neighbourhood is disturbed and many patients, students have to, forego the rest and studies.
4. This part of the statement of the petitioner is correct. Of late the festivity connected with Basant has been extended to nights also. The firing and music and human noise raised during the night do cause disturbance, peace and tranquillity of the neighbourhood. Many accidents are also reported. All this is not called for and is as much disapproved by this Court as by the petitioner' himself. However; the remedy does not lie in judiciary restraining all these things. The remedy, in my view, lies in developing the civil sense coupled with strict enforcement of the provisions of law i.e. Arms Ordinance as well as the directions issued under section 144, Cr.P.C. If these measures do not show the desired result, the remedy thereafter may be in the Assembly making some law on the subject and thereafter, in enforcing it. I am clear that this Court, in the state of law as it is, cannot restrain the citizens from either celebrating or manufacturing and selling kites and other materials. Reliance of the petitioner on the provisions of Articles 9 and 15 of the Constitution alongwith AIR 1986 SC 1847 and PLD 1994 SC 693 is not very appropriate. The security of life and A persons have been guaranteed by the Constitution but its application to the present case is not binding. Petitioner has not contended that his life is, in any manner, in danger by the absence of law in respect of celebration of Basant. The arguments of the petitioner are in the realm of morality and desirability and it is not proper for this Court to enter into the field of morality and desirability in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution.
5. It has also been contended that the very celebration of the festivity of the Basant is un-Islamic under the Constitution. This argument can only be examined by the Federal Shariat Court.
6. For all the above reasons, this petition is disposed of with the observations that respondent-Government will attend to the illegalities accompanying the festivity of Basant and take steps to effectively deal with the same. No order as to costs. H.B.T./M-925/L Order accordingly