2021 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
SHAFIQUE AHMED SHAH Versus The ADMINISTRATOR KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION and 5 others
| Citation | 2021 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh High Court |
| Bench Members | Nadeem Akhtar and Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, JJ |
| Parties | SHAFIQUE AHMED SHAH Versus The ADMINISTRATOR KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION and 5 others |
| Primary Law | (a) Civil service, (b) Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2021 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Civil service, (b) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2021 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh High Court bench comprising: Nadeem Akhtar and Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2021 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (SHAFIQUE AHMED SHAH Versus The ADMINISTRATOR KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION and 5 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Tarique Ahmed Jakhrani for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Scope
Grievance of petitioner was that despite successful completion of the process of appointment and issuance of posting order in pursuance thereof, he was not being allowed to join his duties
Petitioner had statedly filed a representation in that behalf before the Administrator concerned, but till date no action was taken thereon
High Court observed that if any application/representation/complaint was filed by the petitioner before the competent authority, the same shall be decided within fifteen days from receipt of the order strictly in accordance with law
Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.
Constitutional petition under Art.199 of the Constitution
High Court observed that common practice has developed that constitutional petitions are filed before the High Court seeking posting or questioning transfer
Such petty issues should not be brought before the High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution and the Secretary or Head of the relevant department should be approached first in case posting is denied or delayed after appointment or the employee is aggrieved by his transfer
Secretary/Head of such department shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law within fifteen days from the date of receipt of his application/representation
Office of the High Court was directed not to entertain any constitutional petition relating to posting and/or transfer unless the above remedy was exhausted by the person approaching the Court.
Judgment & Decree
NADEEM AKHTAR, J.
It is contended that despite successful completion of the process of appointment and issuance of posting order dated 06.10.2020 (page 25) in pursuance thereof, the petitioner is not being allowed to join his duties. It is stated that a representation in this behalf has been filed by the petitioner before respondent No.1 / Administrator KMC, but till date no action has been taken thereon. If any application / representation / complaint has been filed by the petitioner before the competent authority, the same must be decided by the said authority within fifteen (15) days from receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law. Let notice be issued to respondent No.1 / Administrator KMC for compliance. The petition and pending applications stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. It has now become a common practice that constitutional petitions are filed before this Court seeking posting or questioning transfer. Such petty issues should not be brought before this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, and the Secretary or Head of the relevant department should be approached first in case posting is denied or delayed after appointment or the employee is aggrieved by his transfer. It may be observed that once the process of recruitment / appointment is successfully completed by the candidates and appointment letters / orders are issued in their favour, the department concerned is duty-bound to ensure that they are posted at the relevant post as soon as possible. Any unreasonable delay by the department concerned in posting the appointee would result not only in hardship for the appointee, but also lack of strength, output and efficiency in such department. It is, therefore, directed that in case of unreasonable delay and/or failure on the part of the department concerned in the case of posting, or if the employee is aggrieved by his transfer, the appointee or employee, as the case may be, shall first approach the Secretary / Head of such department through an application / representation. The Secretary / Head of such department shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of his application / representation. In case the matter pertains to transfer, the application / representation shall be decided through a speaking order after providing opportunity of hearing to the applicant-employee. Office is directed not to entertain any constitutional petition relating to posting and/or transfer unless the above remedy is exhausted by the person approaching the Court. The Chief Secretary Sindh is directed to ensure that in future postings should not be denied or delayed by the department concerned, and in any such event if an application / representation / complaint seeking posting is filed by the appointee before the Secretary / Head of the department concerned, the same must be decided by the said Secretary / Head within fifteen (15) days strictly in accordance with law. The above direction shall also be followed in case of applications / representations / complaints by an employee against his transfer. Let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary Sindh, the Secretaries of all the departments in the Government of Sindh, and the Heads of KMC, KDA, MDA and SBCA for compliance. SA/S-7/Sindh Order accordingly.