SCMR 1989

1989 PLP 41 (SCMR)

MABOOD KHAN — Appellant Versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Appeal No. 72-K of 1983, decided on 24th October, 1988
Honorable Judges
Shafiur Rahman, Javid Iqbal and Usman Ali Shah, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 41 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Shafiur Rahman, Javid Iqbal and Usman Ali Shah, JJ
Parties MABOOD KHAN — Appellant Versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Primary Law (c) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978)--, (b) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978), (a) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 41 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: (c) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978)--, (b) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978), (a) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 41 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman, Javid Iqbal and Usman Ali Shah, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 41 (SCMR) (MABOOD KHAN — Appellant Versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(c) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978)-- (b) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978) (a) Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance (XIII of 1978)

Representation

  • Mr. Qamar, Advocate Supreme Court and Mr. Faizanul Haq, Advocate -on-Record (absent) for Appellant.
  • M. A. Siddiqi, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 24th October, 1988.
  • Mr. Qamar, Advocate Supreme Court and Mr. Faizanul Haq, Advocate -on‑Record (absent) for Appellant.
  • M. A. Siddiqi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
  • "Service of Pakistan' means any service, post or office in connection with the affairs of the Federation or a Province, and includes an Ail‑Pakistan Service, Service in the. Armed Forces and any other service declared to be a Service of Pakistan by or under Act of Parliament or of a Provincial Assembly, but does not include service as Speaker, Deputy Speaker, Chairman, Deputy Chairman, Prime Minister, Federal Minister, Minister of State, Chief Minister, Provincial Minister, Attorney‑General, Advocate‑General, Parliamentary Secretary or, Chairman or member of Law Commission, Chairman or member of the Council of Islamic Ideology, Special Assistant to the Prime Minister Adviser to the Prime Minister, Special Assistant to a Chief Minister, Adviser to a Chief Minister or member of a House or a Provincial Assembly."

Headnotes / Summary

(From the Judgment/Order dated 24-8-1983 passed by the High Court of Sind at Karachi in Constitutional Petition No. D-261 of 1983).

S. 3--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212 (3)--Corporation employees- Removal from service--Leave to appeal was granted to examine various Provisions of Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance 1978 for determining jurisdiction and status of petitioner as employee of Corporation who was removed from service of the Corporation.

Ss. 3 & 5--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 240 & 260 Corporation employees--Service of Corporation declared to be "service of Pakistan" by provisions of S. 5 of Ordinance XIII of 1978--Effect on terms and conditions of Corporation employees--Corporation employees being not earlier to Ordinance XIII of 1978, in service of Pakistan, President could not exercise in respect of such employees any power relating to terms and conditions of their service.

Ss. 3 & 5--Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)--Person not deemed to be a civil servant for purposes of Civil Servants Act or Service Tribunals Act--Jurisdiction of High Court relating to grant of relief to such person--Only that employee who has been dealt with, under provisions of S. 3 of Ordinance XIII of 1978, could seek relief from Service Tribunal--Where no action against employee of Corporation was taken under provisions of Ordinance XIII of 1978, such employee could not be deemed to be civil servant, either for purposes of Civil Servants Act 1973 or Service Tribunals Act, 1973--Constitutional remedy as provided under provisions of Art. 212, would not, therefore be a bar to petitioner seeking relief from High Court in its constitutional' jurisdiction--Questions whether petitioner was a statutory employee and whether protection available to him under law had been denied, would have to be determined in the first instance, by High Court.

Judgment & Decree

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J. Leave to appeal was granted to examine they various provisions of the "Corporation Employees (Special Powers) Ordinance, 1978" (hereinafter referred to as the Ordinance), for determining the jurisdiction and the status of the Petitioner, an employee of the Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan who was removed from service of the Bank w.e.f. 1-6‑1981 by an order dated 2‑11‑1982.

2. The respondent challenged this order of removal from Bank service on various grounds which are not necessary to examine in any greater detail. On the 24th of August, 1983, that petition was dismissed in limine holding that by an order dated 14‑2‑1983 in another matter, the Court had already held that "since by a deeming clause, employees of a Corporation have the same rights of appeal as are conferred on persons, who are in the service of Pakistan in relation to matters concerning their service, the constitutional jurisdiction of the court would be barred by reasons of article 212 of the Constitution."

3. As in a number of other appeals before us the provisions of the Ordinance and the effect on the employees of the Corporation was to be examined, a number of learned counsel were heard on the subject. The professed object of promulgating the Ordinance was "to invest the President with certain powers in respect of persons in Corporation Service". A wide definition was provided of "person in Corporation service" in section 2 of the Ordinance. The power was conferred on the President under section 3 notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force or in the terms and conditions of service, in order to take action against a person appointed in Corporation service or promoted during the period from 1st day of January, 1972 to the 5th day of July, 1977, a remedy of representation to the President was provided. Section 5 which has been the subject matter of debate provided as follows:‑‑ "Service of a Corporation is hereby declared to be service of Pakistan and every person in Corporation service who is removed from service, or reverted to a lower post or grade, under this Ordinance, not being a person who is on deputation to a Corporation from any Province, shall be deemed to be a civil service for the purposes of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973 (LXX of 1973)."

4. Service of Pakistan' has been defined in the Constitution in Article 260 in the following words:‑‑ "Service of Pakistan' means any service, post or office in connection with the affairs of the Federation or a Province, and includes an Ail‑Pakistan Service, Service in the. Armed Forces and any other service declared to be a Service of Pakistan by or under Act of Parliament or of a Provincial Assembly, but does not include service as Speaker, Deputy Speaker, Chairman, Deputy Chairman, Prime Minister, Federal Minister, Minister of State, Chief Minister, Provincial Minister, Attorney‑General, Advocate‑General, Parliamentary Secretary or, Chairman or member of Law Commission, Chairman or member of the Council of Islamic Ideology, Special Assistant to the Prime Minister Adviser to the Prime Minister, Special Assistant to a Chief Minister, Adviser to a Chief Minister or member of a House or a Provincial Assembly." Article 240 of the Constitution provided as follows:‑‑ "Subject to the Constitution, the appointments to and the conditions of service of persons in the service of Pakistan shall be determined‑‑ (a) in the case of the service of the Federation, posts in connection with the affairs of the Federation and All Pakistan Services, by or under Act of Parliament; and (b) in the case of the services of a Province and posts in connection with the affairs of a Province, by or under Act of the Provincial Assembly. Explanation.‑In this Article, "Ail‑Pakistani Service" means a service common to the Federation and the Provinces, which was in existence immediately before the commencing day or which may be created by Act of Parliament." Article 241 of the Constitution is as hereunder:‑‑ "Until the appropriate Legislature makes a law under Article 240, all rules and orders in force immediately before the commencing day shall, so far as consistent with the provisions of the Constitution, continue in force and may be amended from time to time by the Federal Government or, as the case may be, the Provincial Government."

5. Being not earlier to the Ordinance, in service of Pakistan, the President could not exercise in respect of such employees any power relating to the terms and conditions of their Service. Declaration by law of "any other service" as service of Pakistan was provided for in Article 260 of the Constitution. This declaration having been made by section 5 of the Ordinance, the President, acquired the power reserved in Article 240, by Section 3 of the Ordinance. Reading section 5 of the Ordinance alongwith the constitutional provisions just reproduced, it follows that in declaring the `person in Corporation service' to be 'in service of Pakistan', power under Article 240 of the Constitution was acquired by tile President for determining their conditions of service. Nothing beyond should be read into that declaration. Next follows in section 5 the deeming provision whereby those employees who have been dealt with under section 3 have en provided a relief/remedy in the Service Tribunal. The deeming clause is available only to those who are proceeded under section 3 of the Ordinance and none else. 'On that view of the matter, as in this case action had not been' taken under the Ordinance, the Petitioner would not be deemed to be a civil servant for the purposes of Civil Servants Act or Service Tribunals Act. Therefore Article 212 of the Constitution was not a bar to the petitioner seeking relief from the High Court, in its constitutional jurisdiction .

6. The questions whether the Petitioner/Appellant was a statutory employee and whether the protection available to him under the law had been denied to him, are questions which will be determined in the first instance by the High Court, Thu appeal is allowed, the judgment of the High Court is set aside and the proceedings are remanded for further proceedings in the matter. No order as to costs. AA./M‑630/S Case remanded.