2007 PTD 211 (PLP)
BACHA SAID through Duly Constituted Attorney Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad and 4 others
| Citation | 2007 PTD 211 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui and Faisal Arab, JJ |
| Parties | BACHA SAID through Duly Constituted Attorney Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad and 4 others |
| Primary Law | Customs Act (IV of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PTD 211 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Customs Act (IV of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PTD 211 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui and Faisal Arab, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PTD 211 (PLP) (BACHA SAID through Duly Constituted Attorney Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad and 4 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sohail Muzaffar for Petitioners.
- Raja Muhammad Iqbal for Respondents Nos.2 to 6.
- After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to give any findings on merits of the case, as it would amount to pre-empt the departmental officers from taking decision in accordance with law. However, the petitioners are facing difficulty on account of accumulation of demurrage and other charges, and in reply to our query as to what maximum order can be made by the Customs Officials in case the petitioners are qualified to import the vehicles and they do not fall in the category of prohibited goods. Mr. Raja Iqbal, Advocate has replied that a fine at 30% can be imposed, therefore, all these petitions in which facts and law, involved are common, are disposed of in the following terms:
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 16 & 17
S.R.O. 574(I)/2005, dated 6-5-2005 [as amended by S.R.O. 179(I)/2006, dated 2-3-2006]
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition
Refusal of authority to release vehicle for its import being prohibited
Importer seeking release of vehicle on payment of 30% fine pending final decision by Authority
High Court disposed of constitutional petition with directions to authority that if importer was found qualified to import vehicle and its import was not prohibited in law, then assess the duty and taxes payable within specified time; but in case its import was prohibited, then importer would not be entitled to its release; and that till final decision of his case, vehicle shall be released on payment of assessed duty, taxes and 30% fine, and in case importer succeeded to establish that he was not liable to pay any fine, then amount paid in excess shall be refunded to him within one month of such decision. Asghar Farooqui, Standing Counsel.
Judgment & Decree
Heard learned counsel for the parties. The grievance of the petitioners is that they have imported the vehicles and on account of delay caused by customs officials they are being burdened with demurrage and other charges, with the passage of each day. Along with the petitioners, the petitioners have submitted an application stating therein that vehicles, the subject-matter of these petitions, imported by the petitioners be released on payment of 30% fine as the practice being adopted by the Collectorate of Customs Karachi and allow the petitioners to deposit such amount in the shape of Pay Order with the Collectorate of Customs (Appraisement), Karachi pending the final decision. In the petitions, the petitioners have taken plea that their passengers arrived at Karachi on 30th June, 2006 and fine on the assessed value cannot be imposed on them under S.R.O. 574(I)/2005, dated 6-6-2005 amended by the S.R.O. 179(I)/2006, dated 2-3-2006. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to give any findings on merits of the case, as it would amount to pre-empt the departmental officers from taking decision in accordance with law. However, the petitioners are facing difficulty on account of accumulation of demurrage and other charges, and in reply to our query as to what maximum order can be made by the Customs Officials in case the petitioners are qualified to import the vehicles and they do not fall in the category of prohibited goods. Mr. Raja Iqbal, Advocate has replied that a fine at 30% can be imposed, therefore, all these petitions in which facts and law, involved are common, are disposed of in the following terms: (i) Mr. Sohail Muzaffar learned counsel for the petitioners, have stated that the goods declarations have already been filed, therefore, the departmental officers are directed to examine the goods and if the petitioners are found qualified to import the vehicles and there is no prohibition in law for the import of such vehicles then the duty and taxes payable be assessed within a period of three weeks from the date of communication of order. (ii) It is clarified that if the vehicles imported are found to be prohibited/contraband and cannot be imported in accordance with the law and the petitioners are not entitled to the release of vehicles even on payment of 30% fine, then the petitioners shall not be entitled for the release of vehicles. However, in case of any adverse order they shall have the right to agitate the matter in appeal or the petition as deemed fit by them. (iii) In addition to the assessed duty and taxes which shall be paid in cash to the Customs Department, the petitioners shall deposit the fine at 30% in the shape of Pay Order with the Collectorate of Customs (Appraisement) Karachi which may be encashed after release of vehicles. In case the petitioners finally succeed their plea that they are not liable to pay any fine then any amount paid in excess shall be refunded to the petitioners within one month of such decision. (iv) On payment of assessed duty and taxes as well as fine at 30%, the respondents shall release the vehicles forthwith. A copy of this order be forwarded immediately to respondent No.4 for compliance. S.A.K./B-16/K??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.