YLR 2024

2024 PLP 1406 (YLR)

USMAN DAR — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Interior Division and 2 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2024-March-27
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2024 PLP 1406 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties USMAN DAR — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Interior Division and 2 others — Respondents
Primary Law Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2024 PLP 1406 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2024 PLP 1406 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2024 PLP 1406 (YLR) (USMAN DAR — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Interior Division and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 3

Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4, 9 & 15

Standing Order No. 2 of 2018 dated 27-04-2018

Blacklisting a person from going abroad

Provisional National Identification List

Continued inclusion

Right to travel abroad

Scope

Petitioner/politician, desirous of performing Umra along with his family, was aggrieved by continuous inclusion of his name in Provisional National Identification List

Plea of the respondents (Federal Investigation Agency etc.) was that the number of FIRs had been registered against the petitioner

Validity

Standing Order No. 2 of 2018 dated 27-04-2018 formulated the Standing Operating Procedure to regulate Provincial National Identification List

Said Notification, while providing a proper mechanism, envisages that name of the person in FIR involved in heinous crimes shall remain on Provisional National Identification List for period of 30 days and placement of name shall expire after lapse of 30 days

However, in the case of petitioner, admittedly, the process as envisaged by the provisions of Standing Order was not followed

Resultantly, the name of the petitioner ought to have automatically been taken off from the Provisional National Identification List

Respondents had no authority to blacklist a person from going abroad and the right to travel is an integral part of the fundamental rights to life and liberty

Pendency of the case against accused can not be a ground to deprive him from his right to travel abroad

High Court declared the continued inclusion of the name of the petitioner on Provisional National Identification List as without lawful authority and of no legal effect, and directed the respondents to allow the petitioner and his family members to travel abroad for performance of Umra

Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

SHAMS MEHMOOD MIRZA, J.

The petitioner is aggrieved by continuous inclusion of his name in Provisional National Identification List and seeks a declaration from this Court that the action of the respondents in including his name is illegal and unlawful and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (the Constitution).

2. The petitioner is a renowned politician who is desirous of performing Umra along with his family and has obtained return tickets from 29.03.2024 till 09.04.2024. His name was included in the Provisional National Identification List on 26th May, 2023. On gaining knowledge about this fact, he filed an application before respondent No.2 but no action till date has been taken on the said application.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents have stated that the petitioner is nominated in various FIRs and, therefore, he cannot be allowed to proceed abroad. They, however, concede that no conclusive determination has been made till date by a court of competent jurisdiction implicating the petitioner with the alleged offences.

4. Standing Order No.2 of 2018 dated 27.04.2018 formulated the Standard Operating Procedures to regulate Provisional National Identification List pursuant to the directions given by the Supreme Court in HRC No.26962 of 2017. According to the said notification, name of the person in FIR involved in heinous crimes shall remain on Provisional National Identification List for a period of 30 days and placement of name shall expire after lapse of 30 days. As per the terms of the standing order, "...It will be the responsibility of the requesting agency to process the case for placement on ECL, through their home Department and follow it up in the Ministry of interior. In case of pendency of ECL case with the Ministry of Interior, the name will remain on the PNIL, till the final outcome of the decision of ECL placement by the Ministry of Interior or competent authority. In case the ECL case is not submitted to the Ministry of Interior, the name from PNIL will be automatically taken off, on the expiry of 30 days from the date of placement of PNIL. A rejection of request for placement on ECL by the Ministry of Interior/ competent authority at any stage shall be deemed as rejection for placement on PNIL".

5. It is an admitted fact that the process envisaged by the aforementioned provision of the standing order was not followed in the case of the petitioner and resultantly the name of the petitioner ought to have automatically been taken off from the Provisional National Identification List on the expiry of 30 days.

6. This Court in the case of Sheikh Shan Ilahi v. Federation of Pakistan and others through Secretary Ministry of Interior, Islamabad and others PLD 2023 Lahore 359 held that the respondent has no authority to blacklist a person from going abroad and that right to travel is an integral part of the fundamental rights to life and liberty. It was furthermore held in the said case that the pendency of the case against accused cannot be a ground to deprive him from his right to travel abroad.

7. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is allowed and it is declared that the continued inclusion of the name of the petitioner on Provisional National Identification List is without lawful authority and of no legal effect. The respondents are directed to allow the petitioner and his family members to travel abroad for performance of Umra subject to furnishing of surety in the sum of Rs.1 Million to be submitted to respondent No.2. MQ/U-4/L Petition allowed.