2012 PLP 1784 (SCMR)
PRESIDENT BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2012 PLP 1784 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J., Jawwad S. Khawaja and Khilji Arif Hussain, JJ |
| Parties | PRESIDENT BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | (b) Constitution of Pakistan, (a) Constitution of Pakistan |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 PLP 1784 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Constitution of Pakistan, (a) Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 PLP 1784 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, C.J., Jawwad S. Khawaja and Khilji Arif Hussain, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 PLP 1784 (SCMR) (PRESIDENT BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kamran Murtaza, Advocate Supreme Court, Malik Zahoor Shahwani, Advocate/President Balochistan High Court Bar, Sajid Tareen, Advocate/Vice President and Hadi Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners (in Constitutional Petition No.107 of 2012).
- Date of hearing: 8th September, 2012.
- Salahuddin Mengal, Advocate Supreme Court for Applicants (in C.M.A. 253-Q of 2012).
- M. Zafar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court as Amicus Curiae.
- Raja Muhammad Irshad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Major Sohail, HQ, FC and Major Shahid, FC for I.-G. FC.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 5
Loyalty to State and obedience to Constitution and law
Scope
Loyalty to State was the basic duty of all citizens and they had to be obedient to the Constitution and the law, wherever they might be
Such duty was also inviolable obligation of every person for the time being within Pakistan
Adherence to the Constitution and the law by the citizens, who were officials or otherwise, was mandatory
Non-compliance of the Constitution and the law made a citizen liable for action, in accordance with law.
Arts. 4, 9 & 184(3)
Constitutional petition under Art.184(3) of the Constitution concerning the law and order situation in Balochistan province
Security of citizen's life, property and liberty
Non-implementation of the Constitution and the law by Government
Effect
Supreme Court observed that Government was bound to enforce fundamental rights in the context of the scenario in Balochistan province, providing security of life, property and liberty, in accordance with law; that non enforcement of such rights of the citizens called for the superior courts to issue directions to the Federal as well as Provincial Governments to protect the life and property of all the citizens equally; that unfortunately both Federal and Provincial Governments avoided for one or the other reason to honour the commitments they had made of ensuring early and safe recovery of missing persons, of taking measures to identify and arrest the culprits involved in the target/sectarian killings, kidnapping for ransom and putting them to justice and of restoring peace and harmony amongst all the segment of society in the province and creating conducive environment for the economic development, well-being and prosperity of the province; that because of failure to honour said commitments no missing person had been recovered; that target killing of innocent citizens, particularly for sectarian consideration including killing of the members of the Ahl-e-Tasheih and other denominations continued; that a judge and two senior police officers had been killed along with so many other members of the law enforcing agencies but no preventive measures were adopted by Federal and Provincial Governments and that abduction for ransom in the province of Balochistan had become a trade which was being committed everywhere in the province, inasmuch as children and professionals like doctors and teachers were not safe
Supreme Court further observed that general impression was that on account of availability of massive arms and ammunitions and non-customs paid vehicles the offences of missing persons, target killing as well sectarian killing and abduction etc. were committed with such vehicles; that allegation against intelligence agencies was that they were issuing Rahdaries (right of passage) to persons who possessed prohibited arms and ammunitions in non-custom paid vehicles and whenever any law enforcing agency apprehended them, they put up resistance on the basis of Rahdaries (right of passage) and went scot free, and that such facts were the root causes for non-implementation of the Constitution and the law. Salahuddin Mengal, Advocate Supreme Court for Applicants (in C.M.A. 253-Q of 2012). Nasrullah Baloch for the Complainants (in C.M.A. No.178-Q of 2012). Maj. Nadir for the Complainants (in C.M.A. No.219-Q of 2012). M. Zafar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court as Amicus Curiae. Malik Sikandar Khan, D.A.-G. for Federation of Pakistan. Asif Yasin Malik, Secretary and M. Irfan, Wing Commander/Director (L) for M/o. Defence. Amanulah Kanrani, A.-G., Babar Yaqool Fateh Muhammad, Chief Secy. Naseebullah Bazaie, Home Secretary and Tarik Umer Khattab, I.-G.P., Kambar Dashti, Commissioner Quetta, Hussain Karar Kh. Additional I.-G.P., Mir Zubair Mehmood, CCPO, Quetta, Hamid Shakeel, D.I.-G. (Investigation) and Saleem Lehri, DIG/CID for Government of Balochistan. Raja Muhammad Irshad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Major Sohail, HQ, FC and Major Shahid, FC for I.-G. FC. Nemo for Mobile Operators. Syed Ikhlaq Hussain Musavi, Zonal Director for PTA.
Judgment & Decree
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, CJ.
The Secretary Home stated at the bar that Farhan son of Ahmar Din Agha aged about 15 years, despite of hectic efforts so far had not been recovered. However, further efforts are under way to achieve the object.
2. The Commandant FC, Dera Bugti is not in attendance. Maj. Sohail, DAG, HQ, FC stated that IG, FC has cancelled his leave on 7-9-2012 informed him about the order of the Court. He was in his native place Malakand from where according to their information he has left by road. However, we have directed Maj. Sohail to place on record the order of the cancellation of the leave and the time when the same was dispatched to him so we may ascertain that despite the directions as to why he is not in attendance. Maj. Sohail has filed the order of cancellation of leave of the Commandant which is to the following effect:-- "CANCELLATION OF LEAVE (.) LEAVE IN RESPECT OF PA - 28344 COLONEL ARSHAD HUSSAIN, COMMANDANT BAMBORE RIFLES FROM 31 AUGUST TO 15 SEPTEMBER 2012 HAS BEEN CANCELLED (.) APPROACH THE OFFICER TO REPORT HQ FC QUETTA FORTHWITH (.) FOR GHQ AGs' BRANCH PS DTE ONLY (.) REQUEST APPROACH OFFICER THROUGH UNITS DEPLOYED IN 11 CORPS AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR CANCELLATION OF LEAVE CMM REPORT TO HQ FC WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT (.) MATTER MOST URGENT".
3. Kaho, the person who is disappeared, has also not been produced despite of our directions. Appropriate orders in this behalf shall be passed on the appearance the Commandant FC, Dera Bugti. In the meanwhile, directions are repeated to the Commandant to effect the recovery of Kaho and produce him before the Court without fail.
4. To be loyal to the State is the basic duty of all citizens and they have to be obedient to the Constitution and the law, wherever they may be. Similarly, it is also inviolable obligation of every person for the time being within Pakistan. Thus, adherence to the Constitution and the Law by the citizens, who are officials or otherwise, is mandatory. Non-compliance of the Constitution and the Law makes a citizen liable for action, in accordance with law. Government is bound to enforce fundamental rights in the context of the scenario in Balochistan, providing security of life, property and liberty, in accordance with law. Non enforcement of such rights of the citizens calls for the superior Courts to issue directions to the Federal as well as Provincial Governments to protect the life and property of all the citizens equally.
5. Hearing of these petitions on different dates, from time to time has persuaded us to issue directions to the Federal and the Provincial Governments through their Chief Executives, the President and the Governor respectively to make commitment, to which they are obliged to fulfil under the Constitution as well as in terms of the statement so made on their behalf on 31st July, 2012 by filing a written statement, which reads thus:-- "In compliance of Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan order dated 24th July, 2012, passed in the subject petition, the Federation of Pakistan and Government of Balochistan submit as under:- That the Federation and the Provincial Government are highly conscious about their constitutional obligations with regard to the security of life and property of citizens as envisaged in Article 9 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. That the Federation and Provincial Government through their LEAs and Intelligence Agencies will make all out efforts to ensure early and safe recovery of missing persons, take steps and measures to identify and arrest the culprits involved in the target/sectarian killings, kidnapping for ransom and put them to justice and will further strengthen/enhance the level of coordination at the highest level amongst the different stakeholders to efficiently discharge with their constitutional obligations and restore peace and harmony amongst all the segment of society in the province and create conducive environment for the economic development, well being and prosperity of the Province. Sd/- Sd/- Secretary M/o. Interior Secretary M/o. Defence Islamabad Rawalpindi Sd/- Sd/- Chief Secretary Inspector-General of Police Govt. of Balochistan Balochistan Sd/- Sd/- Secretary Home and IG, FC Tribal Areas Deptt.Quetta"
6. Court had been endeavouring to exercise restraint at all levels, inasmuch as not taking interest of the Federation to provide assistance through the Attorney-General has also been tolerated by following the one mechanism or the other. The involvement of the functionaries as per the contents of the written statement, noted hereinabove, was nothing but to apprise them about their constitutional obligations. Unfortunately, both Federal and the Provincial Governments avoided for one or the other reason to honour the above statement. As a result whereof:- (1) No missing person has been recovered; (2) Target killing of innocent citizens, particularly for sectarian consideration including killing of the members of the Ahl-e-Tasheih and other denominations continue and day by day its numbers are increasing; (3) An Additional District Judge and two senior Police Officers had been killed along with so many other members of the law enforcing agencies including the Police, F.C., Levies and Costal Guards but without adopting preventive measures by both the Governments; (4) Abduction for ransom in the province of Balochistan has become a trade and this offence is being committed everywhere in the province, inasmuch as the professionals like the doctors and teachers are not safe. The people do come back on their own after paying ransom from their pockets. The children, both male and female are reportedly being kidnapped for which, as well, no resistance has been shown.
7. Inspector-General of Police had submitted report, which is self explanatory.
8. The Secretary Defence was involved to achieve multiple purposes including to assist civil administration and to ensure that if anyone, as alleged, is in the custody of the agencies, he may facilitate their release, as the citizens are alleging involvement of the F.C. and other agencies in this behalf but he had not shown any seriousness except attending the Court on 6-9-2012 and left for Islamabad without any excuse. He appeared today as per directions and had filed statement in writing.
9. The Secretary Interior, despite clear directions, failed to attend either on the ground of his illness or being busy in some meeting over there.
10. The Chairman F.B.R. was also asked to attend the Court as it is general impression that on account of availability of massive arms and ammunitions and non-custom paid vehicles (kabali) the offence of missing persons, target killing as well sectarian killing and abduction etc. is committed with such vehicles. Unfortunately allegation is against the agencies like ISI, MI etc. which are issuing Randaries to the persons who possess prohibited arms and ammunitions in non-custom paid vehicles and whenever any law enforcing agency apprehend them, they put up resistance on the basis of Randaries and go scot free.
11. These are the facts, which are the root causes for non-implementation of the Constitution and the Law.
12. Attendance of Attorney-General, in view of the facts and circumstances noted in the order dated 4th May, 3rd September, 4th September and 5th September, 2012 had been made conditional and no request from him nor either of these Secretaries had been made to allow him to attend the Court, therefore, we direct the Chief Secretary of the government of Balochistan to bring all these facts in the notice of the Prime Minister, Governor as well as the Chief Minister and the Head of the Agencies and outcome of this discussion be reported to us at Islamabad on 19th September, 2012. All the functionaries, who had signed the statement, reproduced hereinabove, are directed to remain in attendance. MWA/P-16/SC Order accordingly.