PTD 2020

2020 PLP 344 (PTD)

N/A

Jurisdiction / Court
Federal Tax Ombudsman
Decided Date
O.M. No.0047 of 2019, decided on 20th December, 2019.
Honorable Judges
Mushtaq Ahmad Sukhera, Federal Tax Ombudsman
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2020 PLP 344 (PTD)
Forum / Court Federal Tax Ombudsman
Bench Members Mushtaq Ahmad Sukhera, Federal Tax Ombudsman
Parties N/A
Primary Law Sales Tax Rules, 2006
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2020 PLP 344 (PTD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Sales Tax Rules, 2006 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2020 PLP 344 (PTD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Federal Tax Ombudsman bench comprising: Mushtaq Ahmad Sukhera, Federal Tax Ombudsman.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2020 PLP 344 (PTD) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Sales Tax Rules, 2006

Headnotes / Summary

R. 11

Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Ss.10, 9(1) & 2(3)

Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the Federal Tax Ombudsman

Own motion complaint

Maladministration

Bogus sales tax refunds

Own Motion complaint against failure of Department to initiate action against claimants of bogus sales tax refunds and their connivers in the Department, bank officials and PRAL management

Federal Tax Ombudsman observed that registration and issuance of refund was not a simple task but required teamwork involving not only beneficiaries of such fraud but also officials in departments and banks who facilitated in opening of bank accounts from which refund cheques were drawn

Failure of Department to initiate action against such persons tantamount to maladministration

Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that Department direct concerned Commissioner to investigate and identify officials involved in registration of fake Registered Persons, and take disciplinary and criminal action and recover amount swindled from public exchequer

Complaint was disposed of, accordingly. Syed Ayaz Mahmood, Advisor, Dealing Officer. Shahid Ahmad, Advisor, Appraisal Officer.

Judgment & Decree

vi) the RP showed purchases from various parties such as 'manufacturers of iron and steel' and 'whole sales waste and scrap', 'manufacturers of plastic products' and whole sale of food and beverage and tobacco' during tax period above amounting to Rs.14.958 and Rs.17.088 million respectively having no relevance to the RP's business activity; and vii) the RP had also made purchase from Noorani Steel a black listed unit. Besides, the RP also facilitated Hanata Trading, a blacklisted unit in getting bogus refund for tax period April, June and August 2012.

3. Thus, Red Alert was accordingly issued by the Directorate of I&I-IR Karachi vide letter dated 25.03.2013, for retrieval of bogus refund already issued and concomitant necessary action against the person(s)/official(s) involved in this nefarious and unlawful activity.

4. The Deptt. remained sleeping over such an important anti tax evasion exercise carried out by I&I-IR led to serious instances of maladministration on account of certain acts of omission and commission, reflecting improper motives, jeopardizing good governance and transparency in tax administration.

5. Comments of the Secretary, Revenue Division, Islamabad were sought in terms of Section 10(4) of the FTO Ordinance read with Section 9(1) of the Federal Ombudsmen Institutional Reforms Act, 2013. In response thereto, the Chief Commissioner-IR (CCIR), RTO-III, Karachi submitted parawise comments vide letter dated 19.11.2019. It was contented that case of the RP was transferred from RTO Karachi (defunct) to RTO-III vide FBR's Jurisdiction order dated 21.07.2016. However, while transferring the RP's case record, the defunct RTO Karachi did sent copy of the Red Alert letter. On the basis of the said "Red Alert", proceedings under Section 21(2) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 (the Act) read with rule 12 of Chapter 1 of Sales Tax Rules, 2006 were initiated, Sales Tax Registration of the RP was suspended by the Commissioner-IR, Regional Tax Office-III, Karachi vide order dated 28.02.2017. As per refund profile prior to Red Alert of the RP was issued eight refund claims. However, no refund was issued to the RP after the receipt of "Red Alert".

6. The averments of the Deptt. considered and case record perused.

7. It is observed that a country-wise investigation against issuance of huge bogus refunds was carried out by the Directorate General I&I-IR FBR. After painstaking exercise, the I&I-IR unearthed number of cases, where fake RPs were registered with the connivance of the staff. The fake RPs claimed on the basis of fake and flying vouchers, bogus refund and in most of the cases get away with fraudulent refund, causing colossal loss to already cash starved exchequer.

8. In the case of RP also on the basis of investigation, Red Alert was issued by the Director I&I-IR Karachi vide letter dated 25.03.2013 pointing out various discrepancies and inconsistencies requiring the Deptt. for further investigation and retrieval of bogus refund amounting to Rs.4.120 million. Unfortunately, the Deptt. did not grasp gravity of the state of affairs, and except blacklisting status of the RP i.e. after prolonged delay of almost 4 years on 28.02.2017; no serious effort appears to have been made for retrieving loss of revenue incurred on account of issuance of refund amounting Rs.4.120 million. Interestingly, the CCIR who contended that case record was received at RTO-III in July 2016 whereas the RP was blacklisted w.e.f 13.04.2017; this amply shows seriousness with which the matter had taken up such an important matter. The Deptt. also did not made any effort whatsoever to unearth the culprits from within and without, who were involved in sales tax registration of the fake RP. Obviously, the registration and issuance of refund was not a simple task but required a team work, involving not only the main beneficiaries of fraudulent refund but also having connivers in the Deptt. and bank officials who facilitated in opening the fake bank accounts through which refund cheques were drawn.

9. The CCIR RTO-III Karachi has tried to absolve himself from the responsibility by simply stating that Red Alert letter was not in the record received from the defunct RTO, Karachi. The studied silence on the part of the CCIR RTO-III Karachi regarding failure to retrieve huge loss of revenue and not initiating action against the culprits is also very strange. This is evidently a case of gross maladministration where, except blacklisting the RP (four years after receipt of Red Alert), the Deptt. has failed to initiate any proceedings for retrieval of bogus refund amounting to Rs.4.120 million pertaining to tax period December, 2009. The outlaws, who were involved in registering the fake RP and issuance of refund cheques were also not taken to task. Sadly, even after filing of the instant complaint, the Deptt. seems disinclined to take any action in this regard. It also sounds strange that the Directorate General I&I-IR FBR and its field offices, after conducting such laudable effort of detecting fraudulent activities whereby national exchequer was made to suffer colossal loss of revenue, and issued letters of Red Alerts to the field formation but did not pursue the matter to its fruition. FINDINGS:

10. Failure of the Deptt. to initiate action against the person (s)/officials(s) involved in registration of fake RP and retrieval of refund already issued prior to issuance of Red Alert, is tantamount to maladministration in terms of Section 2(3)(i)(d) and (ii) of the FTO Ordinance. RECOMMENDATIONS:

11. FBR to- (i) direct the Chief Commissioner-IR, RTO-III, Karachi to investigate and indentify the officials involved in registration of fake RP and initiate disciplinary/criminal action against those found involved; (ii) identify the officers/officials who were involved in processing on the basis of fake and flying vouchers and issuing refund of sales tax pertaining to tax period December 2009, amounting to Rs.4.120 million and take appropriate criminal/disciplinary action against them; (iii) initiate appropriate action including criminal proceedings leading to prosecution of RP and recovery of amount of Rs.4.120 million, swindled from public exchequer; (iv) report compliance within 45 days. KMZ/172/FTO Order accordingly.