2016 PLP 218 (GBLR)
ZAFAR IQBAL — Petitioner Versus BABA JAN and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2016 PLP 218 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ZAFAR IQBAL — Petitioner Versus BABA JAN and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2016 PLP 218 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2016 PLP 218 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2016 PLP 218 (GBLR) (ZAFAR IQBAL — Petitioner Versus BABA JAN and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Manzoor Ahmed, Advocate for Petitioner.
- Advocate-General, Gilgit-Baltistan.
- Amjad Hussain, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
- Munir Ahmed, Advocate along with Shaheen Shah, Returning Officer for Election Commission, Gilgit-Baltistan.
- 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner was questioned as to whether the petitioner has locus standi to file this petition. In reply he submitted that initially the petitioner raised objection regarding the conviction of the respondent No.01 before the respondent No.02 which has not been mentioned by the respondent No.02 in his order dated 29.04.2016 for the reasons best known to him. Since through this petition it has been brought in the knowledge of this court about the conviction of the respondent No.01 recorded by the learned Anti-Terrorism Court Gilgit which holds field. Consequently, this petition vide order dated 20.05.2016 was converted under Article 61 of The Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self Governance) Order, 2009. Consequent thereto, notices were issued to all the respondents as well as to the learned Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan at Gilgit and the learned Advocate General to examine as to whether the provisions of section 99 of The Representation of the People Act, 1976 and Article 37(C) of The Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self Governance) Order, 2009 are attracted or otherwise.
- 6. We have heard the learned counsels for the respective parties, the learned Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan at Gilgit, the learned Advocate General, perused the record of the case file and gone through all the Notifications issued by the Election Commission Gilgit-Baltistan. Consequently, this petition is converted into an appeal and the same is disposed off in the following terms:-
- The copies of this order be sent to the learned Chairman Gilgit-Baltistan Council/the Prime Minister, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the learned Chief Election Commissioner Gilgit-Baltistan, the learned Registrar Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court, the learned Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan, the learned Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan at Gilgit and the learned Advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan for information and compliance.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 7, 11, 14(5), 99 & 108
Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Arts.37(c), 60 & 61
Rejection of nomination papers
Petition for leave to appeal was directed against impugned order passed by Election Tribunal whereby the Tribunal set aside order passed by Returning Officer for rejection of the nomination papers of the candidate and he was declared as qualified candidate to contest the bye-election
Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal by the Supreme Appellate Court and was disposed of with directions that: Election Commission was to announce fresh schedule of bye-election to fill in the vacant seat of the constituency; that Election Commission would issue notifications thereto strictly in terms of Ss.11, 14(5), 108 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 and earlier notification, if any issued in violation of said provisions of law, would be considered illegal, void ab initio and without lawful authority; that notification No.ELC-1(1)/2014-GBLA dated 28-4-2016 appointing Mr. Justice Malik Haq Nawaz as Member Election Tribunal in place of Mr. Justice Yar Muhammad (being on leave), was set aside being illegal, void ab initio and without lawful authority and judgment passed by the Election Tribunal, was set aside; that stay order, by single Judge of Chief Court was set aside and Chief Court was directed to decide appeal on its merits within a period of 2 weeks; that Election Commission was directed to appoint Returning Officer in terms of S.7 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 and in case the contesting candidates would show any reservation, a Judicial Officer not below the rank of Additional District Judge be appointed with the consultation of the Chief Judge, Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court.
Judgment & Decree
DR. RANA MUHAMMAD SHAMIM, C.J.
This petition for leave to appeal was directed against the impugned Judgment dated 04.05.2016 in Election Appeal No. 01/2016 passed by the learned Gilgit-Baltistan Appellate Tribunal. Whereby the learned Appellate Tribunal set aside the order dated 29.04.2016 passed by the respondent No.02 for rejection of the nomination papers of the respondent No.01. Consequently, the respondent No. 01 was declared as qualified candidate to contest the bye-election for the constituency GBLA-6, Hunza/Nagar-III.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner was questioned as to whether the petitioner has locus standi to file this petition. In reply he submitted that initially the petitioner raised objection regarding the conviction of the respondent No.01 before the respondent No.02 which has not been mentioned by the respondent No.02 in his order dated 29.04.2016 for the reasons best known to him. Since through this petition it has been brought in the knowledge of this court about the conviction of the respondent No.01 recorded by the learned Anti-Terrorism Court Gilgit which holds field. Consequently, this petition vide order dated 20.05.2016 was converted under Article 61 of The Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self Governance) Order, 2009. Consequent thereto, notices were issued to all the respondents as well as to the learned Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan at Gilgit and the learned Advocate General to examine as to whether the provisions of section 99 of The Representation of the People Act, 1976 and Article 37(C) of The Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self Governance) Order, 2009 are attracted or otherwise.
3. In the meantime the learned counsel for the petitioner filed Civil Misc. No. 51/2016 in C.P.L.A. No. 40/2016 whereby he submitted the following documents:- i. copy of the short order dated 09.06.2016 of this court passed in Criminal Appeals Nos. 05/2016, 06/2016, 07/2016 and 10/2016 whereby The State appeals were allowed by majority decision while maintaining the conviction and sentences passed by the learned Anti-Terrorism Court Gilgit and set aside the impugned judgment dated 09.04.2015 in Criminal Appeals Nos. 34/2014, 35/2014, 36/2014 and 40/2014 passed by the learned Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court. ii. Copy of the Notification No. ELC-1(1)/2014-GBLA dated 30.04.2015 whereby the Appellate Tribunal was constituted to hear appeals against the acceptance/rejection of the nomination papers powers conferred under section 14(5) by appointing Mr. Justice Shakeel Ahmed, Judge Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court and Mr. Justice Yar Muhammad, Judge Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court as members of the learned Gilgit-Baltistan Election Tribunal. iii. Copy of Notification No. ELC-1(1)/2014-GBLA dated 23.04.2016 was issued in continuation of the Commission earlier Notification No. ELC-1(1)/2014-GBLA dated 30.04.2015. The Tribunal appointed on 30.04.2015 during the general election will try appeals, if any filed with the Tribunal during the bye-election of constituency No. GBLA-6, Hunza -Nagar-III. The election schedule for the said constituency has already been notified. iv. Copy of Notification No. ELC-1(1)/2014-GBLA dated 28.04.2016 in partial modification of the Commission's Notification of even No. dated 23rd April, 2016 and in pursuance of the Notification as notified on 23.04.2016 the learned Chief Election Commissioner Gilgit-Baltistan has been pleased to appoint Mr. Justice Malik Haq Nawaz as Tribunal in place of Mr. Justice Yar Muhammad (being on leave) with immediate effect.
4. On 14.06.2016 the case was adjourned by consent and Mr. Munir Ahmed learned counsel for the Election Commission Gilgit-Baltistan was verbally directed to satisfy this court on the next date of hearing as to whether the learned Chief Election Commissioner Gilgit-Baltistan was conferred powers:- a. To issue Notification for bye-election in terms of section 11 read with section 108 of The Representation of the People Act, 1976. b. As to whether the learned Chief Election Commissioner Gilgit-Baltistan was competent to issue Notification No. ELC-1(1)/2014-GBLA dated 23.04.2016 and 28.04.2016 for constituting the Election Appellate Tribunal and appointing Mr. Justice Malik Haq Nawaz in place of Mr. Justice Yar Muhammad (being on leave)? c. As to whether the learned Returning Officer rejected the nomination papers of one of the contesting candidate namely Baba Jan contesting bye-election on the application of Zafar Iqbal or at his own information regarding his conviction.
5. The case was taken up on 23.06.2016 wherein the same questions were asked from the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.02 and 03 i.e. the Election Commission Gilgit-Baltistan. The case was adjourned to 24.06.2016. On that day it was observed that one of the contesting candidates of the bye-election of the said constituency i.e. Prince Saleem Khan who instead of being defaulter has been declared candidate to contest bye-election by the Returning Officer on the basis of a "Stay Order" dated 29.04.2016 in Civil Misc. No. 89/2016, passed by a learned single Judge Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court in chamber. According to the said Stay Order the case was fixed for hearing on 02.05.2016 before the Division Bench but till today the learned Chief Election Commissioner or the learned Returning Officer has not obtained any copy of the proceeding held on 02.05.2016 in the learned Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court. Whereafter this court issued notices to all the contesting candidates for their appearance on 28.06.2016 and finally the case was heard. This court has asked the same questions to the learned counsel for the respondents Nos. 02 and 03, who could not satisfy this court regarding the queries so raised as well as legally justify for issuance of aforementioned notifications.
6. We have heard the learned counsels for the respective parties, the learned Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan at Gilgit, the learned Advocate General, perused the record of the case file and gone through all the Notifications issued by the Election Commission Gilgit-Baltistan. Consequently, this petition is converted into an appeal and the same is disposed off in the following terms:- (i) direct the Chief Election Commissioner Gilgit-Baltistan to announce fresh schedule of bye-election to fill in the vacant seat of the constituency GBLA-6 Hunza-Nagar-III, issue notifications thereto strictly in terms of section 11 read with section 108 and section 14(5) of The Representation of The People Act, 1976 and Adaptation Order-II of 2015. The earlier Notification, if any, issued in violation of the aforementioned provisions of law would be considered illegal, void ab initio and have been issued without lawful authority. (ii) the Notification No. ELC-1(1)/2014-GBLA dated 28.04.2016 for appointing Mr. Justice Malik Haq Nawaz as member Tribunal in place of Mr. Justice Yar Muhammad (being on leave) is also set aside being illegal, void ab initio and has been issued without lawful authority. Consequent thereto, the impugned judgment dated 04.05.2016 in Election Appeal No.01/2016 passed by the learned Election Tribunal/Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court is also set aside. (iii) the Stay Order dated 29.04.2016 in Civil Misc. No. 89/2016, passed by the learned single Judge Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court in Chamber is also set aside. The learned Chief Court is directed to decide the Civil First Appeal No. 11/2015 titled Prince Saleem Khan versus National Bank of Pakistan etc on its own merit within a period of two (02) weeks on receipt of this order. (iv) The Election Commission is directed to appoint Returning Officer in terms of section 7 of The Representation of the People Act, 1976 and in case the Contesting Candidates show any reservation then a Judicial Officer not below the rank of Additional District Judge be appointed with the consultation of the learned Chief Judge Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court.
7. In view of the above discussion, the learned Chief Election Commissioner Gilgit-Baltistan is directed to issue fresh election schedule and Notifications thereto for bye-election on the said constituency strictly in terms of sections 11, 108 and 14(5) of The Representation of The People Act, 1976 and Adaptation Order-II of 2015 after completing all Codal formalities and complete all election process including holding bye-election of GBLA-6, Hunza-Nagar-III within a period of forty five (45) days on receipt of this order. The copies of this order be sent to the learned Chairman Gilgit-Baltistan Council/the Prime Minister, Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the learned Chief Election Commissioner Gilgit-Baltistan, the learned Registrar Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court, the learned Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan, the learned Deputy Attorney General for Pakistan at Gilgit and the learned Advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan for information and compliance.
8. The appeal is disposed off in above terms. HBT/83/GB Order accordingly.