1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

Compulsory retirement

Civil servant was allotted residential house on condition that same would be vacated by him within 30 days from receipt of notice of Authority for its vacation

As said house was required by Authority to accommodate another officer, Authority issued notice to civil servant to vacate house according to commitment, but he failed to do same due to non- availability of alternate accommodation and some other reasons

Civil servant was removed from service holding him guilty of misbehaviour and defiant attitude

Held, that no doubt civil servant had committed to vacate house within 30 days of the demand made by Authority and he was given ample time to find alternate accommodation for himself, but instead of resorting to extreme step of removal from service, despite civil servant's thirty years long service, he could be ejected through police as was done by Authority later on, it the Authority was not inclined to be compassionate to him by providing him alternate accommodation

Such an extreme step was not at all warranted particularly when civil servant was a low paid employee and had a family of 16 members

Penalty imposed on civil servant for not abiding by his undertaking thus was very harsh,

Compulsory retirement

Authority prior to taking action against civil servant, failed to appoint authorised officer to proceed against civil servant, and instead acted itself as authorised officer by appointing an inquiry officer, a person who had earlier given civil servant a notice to vacate disputed house allotted to him

Impartial inquiry in a case could not be expected of a person who was a party to it

Authority removing civil servant from service, issued civil servant a charge-sheet whereas it was the job of authorised officer

No show-cause notice was given to civil servant before imposition of major penalty on him

Authority had not been able to deal with case dispassionately and judiciously and had inflicted punishment on civil servant which by no means was commensurate with charge of backing out of his commitment

Authority admittedly being guilty of exercising powers which were not available to him under relevant rules, order of Authority was set aside.

Annual Confidential Report

Adverse remarks

On furnishing explanation to adverse remarks, communicated to civil servant, another charge-sheet was served on him and he was directed to submit his reply to charge-sheet to inquiry officer

On receipt of explanation to adverse remarks, Authority was supposed to take decision whether to retain or expunge remarks, but he gave civil servant a second charge-sheet which was not at all needed. -Natural justice, principles of

Violation

Authority; which issued order of removal from service earlier itself issued second charge-sheet which was not at all needed

Functions of Authorised Officer and Authority were arrogated to himself by Authority and thus Authority exceeded powers in utter disregard of rules on the subject

Authority having acted as a Judge in his own case had grossly violated principles of natural justice in circumstances.

Appeal

Limitation

Delay

Condonation

Decision of departmental appeal was reduced to writing after about 2 months from its announcement, thus civil servant filing appeal before Service Tribunal against that order could not get copy of decision of departmental appeal before it was reduced t6 writing

Appellant/civil servant had solemnly affirmed that he could not file application for copy of order in due time as due to strike of clerical staff in those days no one was to receive such application

Delay of 7 days in filing appeal being not too much long was condoned in circumstances.