2024 PLP 529 (CLC)
Mst. NASREEN BIBI and others — Appellants Versus AHBAB AGRO FARMS (PVT.) LTD. through Chairman and MD, Lahore and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2024 PLP 529 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Islamabad |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mst. NASREEN BIBI and others — Appellants Versus AHBAB AGRO FARMS (PVT.) LTD. through Chairman and MD, Lahore and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2024 PLP 529 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2024 PLP 529 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Islamabad bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2024 PLP 529 (CLC) (Mst. NASREEN BIBI and others — Appellants Versus AHBAB AGRO FARMS (PVT.) LTD. through Chairman and MD, Lahore and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ahmed Shahzad Awan for Respondent No.1.
- Ch. Abdur Rehman Hur Bajwa and Atif Ashafique for Respondents Nos.7 to 16.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 24, 96 & 159 [as amended by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act (XIX of 2023)]
Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962), S. 18
Transfer/transmission of the appeal to the District Court from the High Court
Plea of the appellant was that the matter/appeal be transmitted/transfered to the District Court while respondents conceded the same
Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 was amended by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2023, ('Act of 2023') on 03.05.2023 and the District Courts were granted jurisdiction again under S. 18 of the Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962, to the extent of pecuniary matters not exceeding Rs.25,00,000/-, however, when the present appeal was preferred, S.96 of the C.P.C., 1908, at relevant time, stipulated that High Court was the exclusive forum for hearing and deciding appeals against judgment and decree passed by the Courts of plenary jurisdiction
In the present matter, pecuniary jurisdiction was, admittedly, less than Rs.25,00,000/- and if such claim/appeal were to be preferred today, the matter would be agitated in the relevant District Court
Section 16 of the Act of 2023 had amended S.159 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and its amended form showed that all proceedings commenced before the Act of 2023 were considered to be the proceedings of and dealt in accordance with the provisions of the Code which existed prior to the commencement of the Act of 2023
In the explanation to the said Section, it was provided that proceedings included appeal, review, revision, execution applications and/or all incidental matters thereto--Outcome of the amended S. 159, C.P.C. was that appeals or a suit filed prior to the Act of 2023 would continue to be treated as matters agitated under amended S. 96, C.P.C., or other similar provisions pursuant to the amendments made through Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2020
In other words, the amendment made in Act of 2023 shall not disturb the appeals/suits etc. by virtue of change in law
In view of referred provision of law, High Court continued to have jurisdiction to decide the present appeal, however, since a specific request had been made by all the parties present in the Court to transmit the matter to the District Court so that another forum of appeal/revision remained available to the aggrieved party, High Court directed that the order be passed under S. 24, C.P.C., 1908
Section 24 of the C.P.C, 1908, showed that High Court had the jurisdiction to transfer any proceedings including appeals pending before it for trial or disposal to any court subordinate to it and competent to try and dispose of the same
Under the said provision, as the present appeal was pending before the High Court, it certainly had jurisdiction to transfer the same to the court of competent jurisdiction which was District Court as well
A counter argument with respect to transfer of the appeal from High Court to the court of District Court could be that the legislature did not want the proceedings to be disturbed, hence amendment in S.159, C.P.C., was made, however, that argument has little or no substance, as if that was to prevail, S.24, C.P.C., 1908, would become redundant with respect to all proceedings including appeals and suits filed between the year 2020 to 03.05.2023
At present, relevant District Court does have jurisdiction to hear the present appeal pursuant to amendment made in S.96 by Act of 2023
Therefore, High Court transferred/transmitted the appeal to the relevant District Court
Judgment & Decree
AAMER FAROOQ, CJ.
This appeal arises out of judgment and decree dated 18.10.2021 passed by Civil Judge, 1st Class, Islamabad-East.
2. The instant appeal was instituted on 27.10.2021 and at the relevant time, under section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as amended by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2020, this Court was the exclusive forum for appeal against such decrees, however, during course of proceeding in the instant appeal, law stood changed and Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2023 was passed, by virtue of which, section 96 ibid was amended and the District Court was again granted jurisdiction to hear the appeals in accordance with section 18 of the Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962.
3. In the above backdrop, learned counsel for the appellants inter alia contended that instant appeal be transmitted to the District Court for hearing of the same. Upon this, learned counsel for the appellants was confronted with section 16 of the Act of 2023, which amended section 159 of the Code of Civil Procedure with respect to saving of the proceedings. Learned counsel contended that though the amendment saves the proceedings wherever they are, yet propriety demands that since District Court has the jurisdiction in the matter, appeal be heard by the referred forum. He drew attention of the Court towards section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which provides jurisdiction to this Court to generally pass orders for transfer of the case to any court subordinate to it, which has the jurisdiction to decide the matter.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents, present in the Court, conceded that the matter be transmitted to the District Court.
5. Submissions made on the issue of transfer/transmission of the appeal to the District Court, have been heard.
6. The background, which leads to passing of this order, has already been mentioned hereinabove.
7. Section 96 ibid was amended by the Act of 2023 on 03.05.2023 and the District Courts were granted jurisdiction again under section 18 of the Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962 to the extent of pecuniary matters not exceeding Rs.25,00,000/-, however, when the instant appeal was preferred, section 96, as it then stood, provided that this Court is the exclusive forum for hearing and deciding appeals against judgment and decree passed by the courts of plenary jurisdiction. Admittedly, the pecuniary jurisdiction, in the instant matter, is less than Rs.25,00,000/- and if such claim/appeal was to be preferred today, the matter would be agitated in the relevant District Courts of Islamabad. Section 16 of the Act of 2023 amends section 159 of the Code of Civil Procedure and in its amended form, the referred provision of law reads as follows:- "
16. Amendment of section 159, Act No.V of 1908- In the said Act, for section 159, the following shall be substituted, namely:- "
159. Savings of proceedings.- All proceedings instituted prior to the commencement of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2023 (Act of 2023) shall be deemed to be the proceedings of, and dealt in accordance with, the provisions of this Code which existed prior to the aforesaid commencement. Explanation.- In this section, the expression 'proceedings' includes suit, appeal, review, revision, execution applications or any other proceedings and any matter incidental thereto". The bare reading of the Section shows that all proceedings commenced before the Act of 2023 are considered to be the proceedings of, and dealt in accordance with, the provisions of this Code which existed prior to the commencement of the Act of 2023. In the explanation to the referred Section, it is provided that proceedings include appeal, review, revision, execution applications and/or all incidental matters thereto. The outcome of the amended section 159, C.P.C. is that appeals or a suit filed prior to the Act of 2023 shall continue to be treated as matters agitated under amended section 96, C.P.C. or other similar provisions pursuant to the amendments made through Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2020. In other words, the amendment made in Act of 2023 shall not disturb the appeals/suits etc. by virtue of change in law. In view of referred provision of law, this Court continues to have jurisdiction to decide the instant appeal, however, since a specific request has been made by all the parties present in the Court, to transmit the matter to the District Court so that another forum of appeal/revision remains available to the aggrieved party, the order be passed under section 24, C.P.C. For ease of convenience, section 24, C.P.C. is reproduced below and reads as follows:- "
24. General power of transfer and withdrawal. (1) On the application of any of the parties and after notice to the parties and after hearing such of them as desired to be heard, or of its own motion without such notice, the High Court or the District Court may at any stage- (a) transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending before it for trial or disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same, or (b) Withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any Court subordinate to it, and (i) Try or dispose of the same; or (ii) Transfer the same for trial or subordinate or disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same; or (iii) Retransfer the same for trial or disposal to the Court from which it was withdrawn. (2) Where any suit or proceeding has been transferred or withdrawn under sub-section (1), the court which thereafter tries such suit may subject to any special direction in the case of an order of transfer, either retry it or proceed from the point at which it was transpired or withdrawn. (3) For the purposes of' this section, Courts of Additional and Assistant Judges shall be deemed to be subordinate to the District Court. (4) The court trying any suit transferred or withdrawn under this section from a Court of Small Causes shall, for the purposes of' such suit, be deemed to be a Court of Small Causes". The reading of section 24 ibid shows that this Court has the jurisdiction to transfer any proceedings including appeals pending before it for trial or disposal to any court subordinate to it and competent to try and dispose of the same. Under the referred provision, as the instant appeal is pending before this Court, it does have jurisdiction to transfer the same to the court of competent jurisdiction which, as noted above, is District Court as well.
8. A counter argument with respect to transfer of the appeal from this Court to the court of District Court could be that the legislature did not want the proceedings to be disturbed, hence amendment in section 159, C.P.C., was made, however, that argument has little or no substance, as if this was to prevail, section 24, C.P.C., shall become redundant with respect to all proceedings including appeals and suits filed between 2020 to 03.05.2023. It is reiterated that at present, District Court, Islamabad-East does have jurisdiction to hear the instant appeal pursuant to amendment made in section 96 by Act of 2023.
9. In view of foregoing, instant appeal is transferred/transmitted to the District Court Islamabad-East. The parties shall appear before District Judge, Islamabad-East on 27.11.2023, who may hear the matter himself or may mark to any Additional District Judge competent to hear the appeal. MQ/123/Isl. Appeal allowed.