YLR 2017

2017 PLP 2109 (YLR)

JAVED KHAN — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior and 6 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Peshawar
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.1199-P of 2017, decided on 25th April, 2017.
Honorable Judges
Ikramullah Khan and Lal Jan Khattak, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2017 PLP 2109 (YLR)
Forum / Court Peshawar
Bench Members Ikramullah Khan and Lal Jan Khattak, JJ
Parties JAVED KHAN — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior and 6 others — Respondents
Primary Law Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2017 PLP 2109 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2017 PLP 2109 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: Ikramullah Khan and Lal Jan Khattak, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2017 PLP 2109 (YLR) (JAVED KHAN — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary Interior and 6 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance (XLVI of 1981)

Representation

  • Shumail Ahmad Butt for Petitioner.
  • Muhammad Riaz, Special Public Prosecutor for NAB for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

S.2

Placing name of petitioner on Exit Control List

Reference from National Accountability Bureau was pending

Effect

Petitioner was released on bail in two References filed against him by National Accountability Bureau and subsequently his name was placed on Exit Control List

Validity

While prohibiting a person from proceeding to a destination away from Pakistan, Ministry of Interior could not pass its order in a mechanical manner and if it was intended to curtail movement of any person for any reason then prohibition was to be through a speaking order

Petitioner was released on bail in two references filed against him by National Accountability Bureau authorities and no sufficient reason was given for placing his name in Exit Control List

Such order could not be termed as legal and valid

High Court directed the authorities to remove name of petitioner from Exit Control List as order passed by them was illegal, unlawful, without lawful authority and of no legal effect

Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances. Manzoor Khan Khalil, DAG for Federal Government.

Judgment & Decree

LAL JAN KHATTAK, J.

Petitioner, through the instant petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has prayed this court for issuance of an appropriate writ to declare the order (Memorandum No.2/33/2012-ECL) dated 22.01.2013 as illegal, unlawful, without lawful authority, void ab initio and of no legal effect, whereby his name has been placed in the Exit Control List.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a civil servant in the Accountant General's office of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa as an Auditor. He was appointed as Budget Officer, on deputation, with effect from 04.04.2005, in the Police Department, however, on his promotion to BPS-18, he was repatriated to his parent department. According to the record of the case, NAB authorities initiated an inquiry qua involvement of the petitioner and others regarding purchase of some sub-standard equipments in the police department. Pursuant to the ibid inquiry and investigation, petitioner's name was placed in Exit Control List vide order dated 22.01.2013 (the impugned order), which is reproduced as under:-- GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF INTERIOR ******** No.2/33/2012-ECL Islamabad, the January 22nd, 2013. MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: PLACEMENT OF EXIT CONTROL LIST. It has been decided to place the name of Javed Khan son of Turab Khan (CNIC No.17301- 0787960-1), resident of House # 113 Street No. 2 Sector N-2 Phase-IV, Hayatabad Peshawar on Exit Control List, under section 2 of Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981. All concerned are requested to take immediate action in the matter. Sd/- (Mehmood Ahmed) Section Officer (ECL) Tel: 9208179

3. Being aggrieved with the impugned order, petitioner made a Representation to the Ministry of Interior, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad but to no avail, hence the instant writ petition.

4. Arguments heard and record gone through.

5. No doubt, the Federal Government under section 2 of the Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981 can prohibit any person from proceeding to a destination outside Pakistan notwithstanding the fact that such person is in possession of valid travel documents but before exercising the ibid power, the authority must apply its mind judiciously, fairly and justly to the facts of each case. While prohibiting a person from proceeding to a destination from Pakistan, the Ministry of Interior shall not pass its order in a mechanical manner and if it intends to curtail the movement of a person for any reason, then the prohibition must be through a speaking order.

6. When viewed in the context of the above, the impugned order cannot be termed as a lawful order for its being bereft of any reason. It appears that the authority has issued the impugned order in a mechanical manner without applying its mind judiciously, fairly and independently. Restricting free movement of a person from Pakistan is a drastic step, which is permissible only when same is taken not only in the public interest but to justify the prohibition, the authority must give cogent, convincing and appealable reasons sans, which the action to deprive a person of his basic right of free movement guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be countenanced.

7. According to the record, the only reason, though not taken specifically, for passing the impugned order is that there are pending two References against the petitioner under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 but admittedly in both the References, the petitioner has been released on bail by this court, which orders are still in the field.

8. When the petitioner has been released on bail in the two References filed against him by the NAB authorities and when no sufficient reason has been given for placing his name in the Exit Control List, then, on no count, the impugned order can be termed as a legal and valid order.

9. For what has been discussed above, this petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 22.01.2013 is declared as illegal, unlawful, without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Consequently, the Ministry of Interior, Government of Pakistan is directed to remove the petitioner's name from the Exit Control List forthwith. MH/132/P Petition allowed.