PLC(CS) 2006

2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

Dr. Mrs. ZEENAT ISMAIL and others Versus INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION through Director and others

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh Service Tribunal
Decided Date
Appeals Nos.132, 241 of 2002 and Appeals Nos.-123, 177 of 2003, decided on 10th July, 2004.
Honorable Judges
Justice (Retd.) Abdul Ghani Shaikh, Chairman, Yousaf Ali Mirza, Member-1 and Nur Ahmad Shah Member-11
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Sindh Service Tribunal
Bench Members Justice (Retd.) Abdul Ghani Shaikh, Chairman, Yousaf Ali Mirza, Member-1 and Nur Ahmad Shah Member-11
Parties Dr. Mrs. ZEENAT ISMAIL and others Versus INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION through Director and others
Primary Law Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh Service Tribunal bench comprising: Justice (Retd.) Abdul Ghani Shaikh, Chairman, Yousaf Ali Mirza, Member-1 and Nur Ahmad Shah Member-11.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Dr. Mrs. ZEENAT ISMAIL and others Versus INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION through Director and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)

Representation

  • Munawar Hussain for Appellant (in Appeal No.132 of 2002).
  • Gohar Iqbal for Appellant (in Appeal No.241 of 2002).
  • Arif Riaz for Appellant (in Appeal No.123 of 2003).
  • Abrar Bukhari for Appellant (in Appeal No.177 of 2003).
  • Shahid Jamil for Respondents I.B.A.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 2(a), 2(aa), 3-E & 4

Appeal

Competency

Jurisdiction of Tribunal

Respondent Institute had challenged the very jurisdiction of Tribunal to entertain, hear and decide appeals filed by appellants against their grievances

Plea of respondent Institute was that it was an educational institution, and was not carrying any work in connection with affairs of Province and it was established and set up only for the purpose to confer degrees, besides, Provincial Government did not own or control any share of respondents

Contention was that appellants, in circumstances could not be deemed to be civil servants under S.2(a) of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 and could not maintain appeals

Validity

Apart from the fact that respondent Institute was established by Provincial enactment, same was being controlled by Provincial Government and its overall administration also lay with Provincial Government

Employees of respondent Institute, in circumstances, would be deemed to be civil servants for the purpose of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 and matters relating to their terms and conditions of service, were to be decided by Tribunal under provisions of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973

Tribunal, in circumstances, had jurisdiction to entertain, hear and decide appeals filed by appellants. Manzoor Ali Khan for I.B.A. (in Appeal No.132 of 2002).

Judgment & Decree

In all the above titled four appeals, the actions of the Institute of Business Administation (Commonly known as I.B.A.) have been challenged.

2. M/s Shahid Jamil, learned counsel on behalf of O.B.A. has challenged the very jurisdiction of this Tribunal to entertain, hear and decide these appeals.

3. It has been argued that Respondent I.B.A. is an educational institution not carrying on work in connection with the affairs of the Province and that I,B.A. was established and setup only for the purpose to confer degrees. Besides, the Provincial Government does not own or control any share of the respondents or the I.B.A., hence appellants cannot be deemed to be Civil Servants under section 2(a) of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973. In support of this contention, learned counsel has given the historical background/Establishment of' I.B.A.

4. In reply, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants categorically stated that I.B.A. was setup and established by the Provincial Government. It has further been pleaded that I.B.A. is subsidiary of the Karachi University and its control, management and administration is being looked by the Karachi University as well as by the Provincial Government. Therefore, the employees of the I.B.A. are civil Servants for the purpose of filing appeals before this Tribunal.

5. We have considered the above submission and have gone through the material placed on record. In view of insertion of sections 2(aa) and 3-E in the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973, the employees of Corporation were declared civil servants for the purpose of said Act. Section 2(aa) inserted by Sindh Act No.XXXI of 1994 dated 16-1-1995, reads as under: "2(aa) "Corporation means a Corporation or Institution setup or established by 'a Provincial enactment" Section 3-E, reads as under; "3-E. Notwithstanding, anything contained in any law, service of Corporation is hereby declared to be the service of the province and every person holding a post in the Corporation, not being a person who is on deputation to the Corporation shall, for the purposes of this Act be deemed to be a civil servant." Likewise section 2-A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, is also reproduced hereunder for ready reference: "2-A. Service under certain Corporations, etc. to be service of Pakistan:--Service under any authority, corporation, body or organization established by or under a Federal Law or which is owned or controlled by the Federal Government or in which the Federal Government has a controlling share or interest is hereby declared to be service of Pakistan and every person holding a post under such authority, corporation, body or organization shall be deemed to be a civil servant for the purposes of this Act."

6. There is no denial of the fact that Institute of Business Administration was reconstituted and reorganized under Act XX of 1994 by the Provincial Government to confer on it the power to award degrees. It was initially established by the University of Karachi under section 28(1)(g) of the University of Karachi Act, 1972. However, it is still a subsidiary to the ,Karachi University. Mere fact that the institution has been setup under the provincial enactment does not mean that its employees are 'Civil Servants' for the purpose of filing appeals before this Tribunal, for the simple reason that several private Universities i.e. lqra University, Baqai Medical University, Agha Khan Medical University, etc., were also setup under the Provincial enactments. However, apart from the fact that I.B.A. was established by Provincial enactment, this, Institute is being controlled by the Provincial Government and its overall administration also lay with the Provincial Government. The patron and the Controlling Authority of the Institute as per section 7 of the Act is Governor of Sindh. Its Director and Director of Finance shall be appointed by the Patron who shall hold office during the pleasure of the patron. The terms and conditions of their appointment shall also be administered by the Patron. The institute shall have a fund to which shall be credited all grants made by any Government etc., and its accounts shall be audited once a year by an auditor appointed by the Auditor-General of Pakistan. For all practical purposes, the I.B.A. and its officers/officials are looked after, administered and controlled by the Government.

7. A glance at the Act XX of 1994 expressly reflects the control, management and administration over the affairs of the Institute of Business Administration by the Provincial Government.

8. We are, therefore, of the firm view that the employees of the Institute of Business Administration (I.B.A.) shall be deemed to be Civil Servants for the purpose of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973. Thus the matters relating to the terms and conditions of their service are to be decided by this Tribunal under the provisions of the Act supra. This Tribunal has, therefore, jurisdiction to entertain, hear and decide the appeals above titled.

9. Announced in open Court this 10th July, 2004. All these appeals adjourned to 5-8-2004 for further proceedings. H.B.T./44/KST Order accordingly.