1998 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
SHAHID JAVED Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others
| Citation | 1998 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Ihsan-ul-Haq Chaudhry, J |
| Parties | SHAHID JAVED Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others |
| Primary Law | (b) Civil Services Rules (Punjab), (a) Civil Services Rules (Punjab), (d) Civil Services Rules (Punjab) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Civil Services Rules (Punjab), (a) Civil Services Rules (Punjab), (d) Civil Services Rules (Punjab), (c) Civil Services Rules (Punjab) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Ihsan-ul-Haq Chaudhry, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (SHAHID JAVED Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Farooq Bedar for Petitioner.
- Ghulam Haider Alghizali, Addl. A.-G., Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti, A.A.-G. and Rana Muhammad Arif, Addl. A.-G. for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3.
- Masood Arshad, Legal Advisor for Respondents Nos. 4 to 6.
- Dates of hearing: 10th, 11th, 14th, 15th, 21st, 22nd July and 19th August, 1997.
- 3. On the other hand, learned Additional Advocate-General and Assistant Advocate-General and Legal Advisor of the Jinnah Hospital submitted that many of the occupants are in possession on the force of directives issued during period of 3-2-1994 to 15-5-1996 from the Chief Minister's Secretariat. It is added that the accommodation available in the Complex is shared by the Jinnah Hospital and Allama lqbal Medical College. It was noted that there was no set policy for the administration of this property. The result was that the Government property had lost all sanctity and was treated as personal property by whosoever got the opportunity. The learned Additional Advocate-General explained that no directive has been issued since after the present Government came into power and all the directives were issued by the Ex Chief Ministers.
- 8. Rana Muhammad Arif, learned Additional Advocate-General also pointed out that some officials, who are guilty of trespass and occupation of residential accommodation beyond entitlement have filed civil suits and the decision of stay petitions has been delayed for years together. It is also added that such suits are not competent because a Government servant cannot possess accommodation in violation of law and rules. Be that as it way, the Civil Court or First Appellate Court while hearing stay petition in respect of official accommodation or appeal there from shall decide the same normally within one month.
Headnotes / Summary
R. 5.45(i) & (ii)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 201, 202, 213, 217, 448 & 451
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Government residences
Illegal occupation by Government servants without entitlement
Remedial measures suggested by High Court.
R. 5.45(i) & (ii)
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199
Constitutional petition-- Government residences in illegal occupation of Government Officers
Civil suits and stay orders filed by defaulting officers delayed matter for years-- Remedy
Civil Court or First Appellate Court while hearing stay petition in respect of official accommodation or appeal therefrom, to decide the same normally within one month.
R. 5.45(i) & (ii)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-- Constitutional petition
Government residences belonging to Medical College Complex
Chief Minister either allotting or extending period of occupation of previous allottees
All directives issued by Chief Minister or any other Government functionary in that behalf were void ab initio, illegal and without jurisdiction.
R. 5.45(i) & (ii)
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-- Constitutional petition
Occupation by Government servant without entitlement
Notice to vacate such residence issued to Government servant
Constitutional petition of Government servant was -partially allowed with direction that action for vacation should be taken against petitioner alongwith all other illegal occupants at one and the same time in accordance with policy framed by Authorities
Till then petitioner was not to be disturbed.
Judgment & Decree
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that since the petitioner remained posted at Lahore, therefore, as per policy notified through Notification dated 30-6-1979 by the Finance Department the petitioner was entitled to retain the accommodation in his possession even after his transfer from the Jinnah Hospital. It was added that there were number of officials, who have along been transferred from the hospital and even to outstations but they are still retaining the official accommodation. In this behalf, it was argued that a few officials have even ceased to be in Government service still they are not being -asked to vacate the official accommodation illegally and mala fide.
3. On the other hand, learned Additional Advocate-General and Assistant Advocate-General and Legal Advisor of the Jinnah Hospital submitted that many of the occupants are in possession on the force of directives issued during period of 3-2-1994 to 15-5-1996 from the Chief Minister's Secretariat. It is added that the accommodation available in the Complex is shared by the Jinnah Hospital and Allama lqbal Medical College. It was noted that there was no set policy for the administration of this property. The result was that the Government property had lost all sanctity and was treated as personal property by whosoever got the opportunity. The learned Additional Advocate-General explained that no directive has been issued since after the present Government came into power and all the directives were issued by the Ex Chief Ministers.
4. The menace has become so common that it was decided to treat this as a notice case. The Secretary Health was also sent for and asked to assist this Court to formulate basic rules to deal with the property of Jinnah Hospital particularly and Government property generally. It is pointed out that now there is a tendency to illegally occupy the official accommodation or assume the possession illegally. It amounts to one and the same thing. A Government servant is not sacred cow if he occupies or move into official accommodation illegally he is fully covered by the mischief of sections 448, 451 and other provisions of P.P.C. and the incharge or custodian of the property, who fails to get a criminal case registered against such trespasser renders himself liable as an accused under the provisions of Chapter XI of the P.P.C. The learned Legal Advisor of the Jinnah Hospital informed that the hospital authorities have framed a policy regarding the allotment, vacation etc. of the hospital accommodation now.
5. It is common scene that Government servant even after transfer out of station does not vacate the official residence. This should not be tolerated in any case because on one hand, the others posted at the station are deprived of his facility and on the other hand, the official so posted keeps on creating occasions for visiting his family at the public expense. This adversely affects his working and efficiency and on the other hand, it is a continuous drain of public exchequer. Moreover, the officer holding administrative post would have no time or occasion to study the local problems at their gross root. However, it is desirable that the official may be allowed to complete his normal tenure of posting. This would help to solve this problem.
6. The discipline amongst the Government servants is at the lowest ebb. The Rehabilitation and Settlement Department has also beside other evils gave rise to the class now known as property grabbers. They are both in the public and Government offices. Not only the residential accommodation is being treated free for all even the rest houses and rooms in the hospital have also not been spared. This situation cannot be allowed to go unchecked. This menace before it spreads and takes over everything has to be stopped with a strong hand. There is no need for any fresh legislation. The Government servant taking law into his own hand can be dealt very appropriately and effectively under the law of the land but the problem is that the concerned authorities ignore such offences cognizable under P.P.C. and acts of gross-misconduct under E&D Rules. They are not mindful of the provisions of the Pakistan Penal Code, which renders them also liable for criminal prosecution for their inaction against an accused person. Reference in this behalf can be made to provisions of Chapter XI of the Penal Code and more particularly sections 201, 202, 213 and 217.
7. The public properties/Government residences can be protected if following measures, in accordance with the law of the land, are taken by the concerned authorities:-- (i) that if a Government servant illegally occupies a Government accommodation or is found in illegal possession .then the Incharge/Custodian of such property shall get a criminal case registered against the trespasser; (ii) that an official continuing in occupation of residential accommodation beyond his entitlement shall be charged rent at the market rate This should be worked out and intimated to such officials and proceedings for recovery of the same shall be initiated the moment the rent becomes payable and the concerned authority shall not wait even for the next month; (iii) that the period for vacation of the premises on transfer, retirement or death may be made for 4 months and rule 5.456 ) and (ii) of the C.S.R. amended accordingly; (iv) that the proceedings against trespassers, illegal occupants should be initiated the moment fact of trespass or illegal occupation comes to the notice of the authority or the moment property is occupied beyond entitlement. The normal practice now is that the concerned authorities takes years to initiate proceedings; (v) that the officer guilty of criminal acts in respect of official residence should, also, be proceeded under E&D Rules and copies placed on their A.C.R. dossiers. There is no scope in law and the rules for making allotment to an official beyond his entitlement; (vi) that the Chief Minister has no authority or jurisdiction to issue any directive or direction allotting property or extending period of occupation beyond the provisions of rules. This would include allotment beyond entitlement. All such directives should be treated as nullity and the occupant be dispossessed in accordance with law and rules; (vii) that all illegal occupants should be proceeded against at one and the same time so as not to give rise to an argument to anyone that he has meted with discriminatory treatment; and (viii) that the officer incharge/custodian of the Government property ignoring to proceed, as indicated above, shall be proceeded for inefficiency and also for the loss suffered by the State due to his lack of action besides criminal proceedings under Chapter XI of P. P. C. These are some of the measures which can be adopted to protect the public property tinder law and rules.
8. Rana Muhammad Arif, learned Additional Advocate-General also pointed out that some officials, who are guilty of trespass and occupation of residential accommodation beyond entitlement have filed civil suits and the decision of stay petitions has been delayed for years together. It is also added that such suits are not competent because a Government servant cannot possess accommodation in violation of law and rules. Be that as it way, the Civil Court or First Appellate Court while hearing stay petition in respect of official accommodation or appeal there from shall decide the same normally within one month.
9. Now coming to the case in hand. The residential accommodation belonged to the Allama Iqbal Medical College Complex, therefore, Government had no business either to allot the same to anyone or to extend the period of occupation of a previous allottee. All directives issued in this behalf by the then Chief Ministers or any other Government functionary are void ab initio, illegal and without jurisdiction.
10. The upshot of the above discussion is that this writ petition is partially allowed with the direction that the action for vacation shall be taken against the petitioner along all other illegal occupants at one and the same time in accordance with the policy framed by the hospital authorities and placed on record. Till then petitioner not to be disturbed. There is no order as to costs. Let copies of this judgment be sent to the Secretary Establishment, Government of the Pakistan and Chief Secretary, Government of the Punjab, to ensure compliance of para. 7 of the judgment by the concerned authorities while Registrar to communicate the observations in para. 7 to all the subordinate Courts. A.A./S-144/L Order accordingly.