CLC 2000

2000 PLP 793 (CLC)

KARIM SHAH and 21 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ZOOR BACHA and 21 others‑‑‑Respondents.

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Writ. Petition No.570 of 1994, decided on 28th September, 1999.
Honorable Judges
Mian Mirhannrad Ajtnal
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2000 PLP 793 (CLC)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Mian Mirhannrad Ajtnal
Parties KARIM SHAH and 21 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ZOOR BACHA and 21 others‑‑‑Respondents.
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP 793 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP 793 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Mian Mirhannrad Ajtnal.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP 793 (CLC) (KARIM SHAH and 21 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ZOOR BACHA and 21 others‑‑‑Respondents.). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Ataullah Khan for Petitioners.
  • Muhammad Amin Khattak for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 28th September, 1999.

Headnotes / Summary

Provincially. Administered Tribal Areas Civil Procedure (Special Provisions) Regulation (1I of 1975)‑‑‑ . ‑‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 190‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Share in royalty of forest‑‑‑Petitioners claimed 1/7th share in the royalty of the forest situated in their area which was a Provincially Administered Tribal Area‑‑‑"Jirga" was constituted to resolve such dispute‑‑‑Original members of "Jirga" were not attending the proceedings, therefore, with the consent of the parties new members of "Jirga" were appointed‑‑‑Trial Court on the basis of findings of "Jirga" decreed the suit of the petitioners‑‑‑Provincial. Government set aside the decisions of the forums below on the ground that the members of "Jirga" did not belong to the area of dispute ‑‑‑Validity‑‑ Order of the Trial Court passed on the unanimous recommendations of "Jirga" and upheld by the Additional Commissioner reflected no infirmity Where "Jirga" was constituted with the consent of both the parties in the light of compromise between them, the High Court could grant extraordinary relief to petitioners through such Constitutional petition‑‑‑Order of the Provincial‑ Government was set aside and that of the Trial Court restored‑‑ Petition was allowed accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN J.‑‑‑ Karim Shah and 21 others u have brought the present petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. 1973 for declaration that the judgment and decree of respondent No.22 namely, Home Secretary. Government of N.‑ . W.F.P., Peshawar, dated 7‑12‑1993 was illegal, without jurisdiction and without lawful authority and. Therefore, have prayed for restoration of the judgment and decree of respondent No.24 namely, A.D.C./D.C. under P.A.T.A. Regulation, dated 6‑10‑1991 Annexure 'E'. During the pendency of the writ petition respondent No.3 was reported dead and his legal representatives brought on record.

2. The facts of the case briefly stated are that the petitioners had instituted a suit against respondents 1 to 21 before the A.D.C./D.C., Swat under the P.A.T.A. Regulation for a declaration that the petitioners were entitled to 1/7th share in the royaltyof the forest situated in Village Ramait, Tehsil Behrain, District Swat and that the defendants had no right to refrain them from claiming their respective share. The aforesaid suit was referred to the Jirga in terms of the issues framed on the pleadings of the parties and the Jirga was constituted under the Chairmanship of Tehsildar Revenue, Swat having two members namely Haji Sherin Jalal and Haji Hazrat Yousaf of Mingora. The Jirga recorded the evidence of both the parties and unanimously resolved that by virtue of a compromise dated 17‑1‑1983 the defendants had admitted the claim of the plaintiffs to the extent of 1 /7th share of Daftar, in respect of royalty in the disputed forest since 1983, the Additional Deputy Commissioner, therefore, decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiffs on 20‑1‑1990. The respondents then filed an appeal before the Additional Commissioner, Malakand which failed on 6‑10‑1991. Thereafter, a revision petition was preferred by them before the Nome Secretary, respondent No.24 who vide his order dated 7‑12‑1993 accepted the revision petition, set aside the orders of Courts below and remanded the case back to the Assistant Commissioner,' Swat ‑for a fresh decision observing that the" Jirga members have initially passed the award, did not belong to the area of dispute namely. Kohistan Area, Tehsil Behrain, therefore, according to the learned Additional Secretary, Home the proper persons for Jirga were to be selected from the elders of the local area where the dispute arose.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case.

4. Admittedly there was a protracted litigation between both the contesting parties before the proper forum. In reply of the suit written statement was submitted, issues were framed and evidence of the parties was recorded. The order‑sheet, dated 9‑9‑1987 of the Court of D.C., P.A.T.A. would suggest that the Chairman had once suggested before the Court that the previous members of the Jirga were not attending the proceedings, therefore, instead of Haji Cherri, new members namely, Haji Sherin Jalal and Haji Hazrat Yousaf be nominated. This proposal was accepted by the representatives of both the parties and they did not object to the constitution of the aforesaid Jirga. Even in this Court this petition was admitted on 20‑9‑1994 that since both the parties had agreed to the appointment of second Jirga, therefore, the petition was admitted for consideration. We are, therefore, of the view that upon the unanimous recommendation of the Jirga, the trial Court had passed the order dated 20‑1‑1990, which was upheld by the Additional Commissioner, on 6‑10‑1991 reflects no infirmity. The Jirgal was definitely constituted with the consent of both the parties in the light of the compromise between them. This Court, therefore, can grant extraordinary relief through Constitutional petition when the matter is settled A through consent/compromise. We, therefore, accept this petition, set aside the orders of the , Home Secretary, dated 7‑12‑1993 and restore the order, dated 6-10‑1991 as prayed for. , Q.M.H./M.A:K/499/P Petition allowed.