2010 PLP 254 (CLD)
UNILEVER PAKISTAN FOODS LIMITED through Company Secretary — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, ENVIRONMENTAL TRIBUNAL, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE — Respondent
| Citation | 2010 PLP 254 (CLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | UNILEVER PAKISTAN FOODS LIMITED through Company Secretary — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, ENVIRONMENTAL TRIBUNAL, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | (a) Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 254 (CLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 254 (CLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 254 (CLD) (UNILEVER PAKISTAN FOODS LIMITED through Company Secretary — Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, ENVIRONMENTAL TRIBUNAL, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Ijaz Ali Sabzwari for Petitioner.
- Aamer Rehman, Deputy Attorney General for Respondent.
- 16. To appoint any legal practitioner, Solicitor, Pleader, Legal Counsel or Advocate to appear and act for the Company and to represent the Company in any matter, and to sign and deliver letters of authority and Vakalatnamas in favour of such persons; and to revoke any such appointment at any time at his pleasure. To appear as Legal Counsel/Attorney before any Court for the Company or its affiliates and subsidiaries as and when required.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss.2(24) & 48
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.III, Rr.1, 2, 3, O.XXIX, R.1 & O.XLI, R.1
Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (XXXIV of 1997) S.22
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition--Appeal by company through its Secretary holding registered General Power of Attorney issued in his favour on basis of resolution of its Board of Directors--Order of Tribunal directing appellant to amend. title of appeal by inserting words "through its Chief Executive with full name" and mentioning present address of its factory
Appellant was a juristic person being a registered company limited by shares
Any notice or process served at registered office of appellant already given in title of appeal would be deemed in law to be duly served, notwithstanding the fact where appellant was running its business
Pleadings in legal proceedings initiated on behalf of a juristic person could be signed by any person authorized to do so under Articles of Association of company or authorized by its Board of Directors through a resolution passed in a duly convened meeting or authorized to do so through a General Power of Attorney issued under authority of Board of Directors given in a duly convened meeting
Address of registered office of appellant given in title of appeal would ordinarily be sufficient for purposes of filing of appeal--Appellant had mentioned address of its factory in body of appeal
High Court set aside impugned order and directed Tribunal to decide appeal on its merits.
O.VI, Rr.1, 14, O.XXIX, R.1 & O.XLI, R.1--Pleadings in legal proceedings initiated on behalf of juristic persons, signing of-Principles.
Judgment & Decree
IJAZ-UL-AHSAN, J.
The petitioner assails an order dated 26-10-2009, passed by the Environmental Tribunal Lahore (Impugned Order). Through the impugned order the petitioner was directed to amend the title of the appeal by inserting the words "through its Chief Executive (with full name)". The petitioner was also directed to provide the present address of the factory of the petitioner in the title of the appeal.
2. It appears that the order in question has been passed on the assumption that pleadings in legal proceedings initiated by a juristic person are required by law to be signed by the Chief Executive of such juristic person and his name and particulars must also be mentioned in the title of such pleadings.
3. The learned Tribunal appears to have overlooked the provisions of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 as well as those of land Order XXIX Rule, 1 read with Order III, C.P.C., which provide for initiation of proceedings through authorized representatives. Order XXIX Rule 1, C.P.C. provides as follows:-- (1) Subscription and verification of pleadings.
In suits by or against a corporation, any pleading may be signed and verified on behalf of the corporation by the Secretary or by any Director or other principal officer of the corporation who is able to depose to the facts of the case.? Order III rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 postulate as follows:-- (1) Appearances, etc., may be in person, by recognized agency or by pleader.--Any appearance, application or act in or to any Court, required or authorized by law to be made or done by a party in such Court may, except where otherwise expressly provided by any law for the time being in force, be made or done by the party in person, or by his recognized agent, or by a pleader [appearing, applying or acting, as the case may be,] on his behalf. (2) Recognized agents.--The recognized agents of parties by whom such appearances, applications and acts may be made or done are
(a) persons holding powers-of-attorney, authorizing them to make and do such appearances, applications and acts on behalf of such parties; [underlining is mine] (b) persons carrying on trade or business for and in names of parties not resident within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court within which limits the appearance, application or act is made or done, in matters connected with such trade or business only, where no other agent is expressly authorized to make and do such appearances, applications and acts. (3) Service of process on recognized agent.--(1) Processes served on the recognized agent of a party shall be as effectual as it the same had been served on the party in person, unless the Court otherwise directs. (2) The provisions of the service of process on a party to .a suit shall apply to the service of process on his recognized agent. In the Companies Ordinance, 1984 the term "officer" of the company has been defined as follows:-- 2(24) "Officer" includes any Director or Chief Executive, Managing Agent, Secretary or other Executive of the Company???.. Section 48 of the Companies Ordinance deals with service of documents on the company. It would be useful to reproduce the said section:-- Section 48: Service of documents on Company. A document may be served on a Company or an officer thereof by sending it to the Company or officer at the registered office of the Company by post under a certificate of posting or by registered post or by leaving it at the registered office of the Company.?
4. The petitioner is admittedly a juristic person being a company limited by shares. It is registered as a company with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan under the provisions of the Companies Ordinance, 1984. It has its registered office at Avari Towers Fatima Jinnah Road, Karachi. The said address has been provided by the Company to the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan for service of notices process etc. Any process served at the said office shall be deemed in law to be duly served, notwithstanding the fact where the company runs its business.
5. Pleadings in legal proceedings initiated on behalf of juristic persons can be signed by any person (i) authorized to do so under the Articles of Association of the Company or (it) authorized by its Board of Directors through a resolution passed in a duly convened meeting of such Board or (iii) authorized to do so through a general power of attorney issued under the authority of Board of Directors given in a duly convened meeting of the Board.
6. Perusal of the record indicates that a resolution of the Board of Directors of the petitioner company was passed on 24-7-2003. It was resolved that a general power of attorney be issued in favour of Mr. Amar Naseer, Company Secretary of the petitioner. Such power of attorney was subsequently issued and registered with the Registrar of Assurances at Karachi. Vide items Nos. 13, 14, 15 and 16, the Company Secretary of the petitioner was authorized to:--
13. To institute, commence, prosecute, enforce, defend, answer, compromise, or oppose all actions, suits, petitions, appeals, arbitration proceedings, and other legal proceedings, actions and demands touching any matter in which the Company is or may hereafter be party, interested or concerned; and also, if thought fit, to compromise, withdraw, settle, refer to arbitration, mediation or conciliation, submit to judgment or become non-suited in any such matters, and to file such appeals and applications for review, revision or otherwise as the Attorney shall think fit.
14. To accept service of any writ or summons notice or other legal process and to appear and represent the Company in any Court, tribunal, authority commission or committee and before all Magistrates, Judicial, Municipal, Revenue or other officers whatsoever as the Attorney may think fit.
15. To sign and verify all plaints, written statements, affidavits, applications, answers, submissions, petitions, claims, objections memoranda of appeal and petitions and applications of all kinds and to file or submit them in or before any Court, tribunal, authority, commission or committee or arbitrator. To give evidence before any Court, Tribunal authority commission or committee or office or arbitrator.
16. To appoint any legal practitioner, Solicitor, Pleader, Legal Counsel or Advocate to appear and act for the Company and to represent the Company in any matter, and to sign and deliver letters of authority and Vakalatnamas in favour of such persons; and to revoke any such appointment at any time at his pleasure. To appear as Legal Counsel/Attorney before any Court for the Company or its affiliates and subsidiaries as and when required.
7. For the purpose of filing of the appeal, the address of the registered office of the company given in the title of the appeal is ordinarily sufficient. However, if the address of the factory/works of the appellant was required, the learned counsel has pointed out that the same had been provided in paragraph No.2 of the appeal.
8. In passing the impugned order dated 26-10-2009, the aforesaid documents and their contents appear to have escaped the notice of the learned Environmental Protection Tribunal.
9. In view of the above, this petition is accepted. The order dated 26-10-2009 passed by the Environmental Tribunal, Lahore in the appeal titled "Unilever Pakistan Foods Limited v. Environmental Protection Agency" is set aside. The learned Environmental Tribunal shall now proceed to decide the appeal on its merits. S.A.K./U-19/L???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Case remanded.