PLC(CS) 2022

2022 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

ANWAR MEHMOOD Versus SHAKEEL QADIR, CHIEF SECRETARY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR and 2 others

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court (AJ&K)
Decided Date
Application No.150 of 2021, decided on 19th June, 2021.
Honorable Judges
Sadaqat Hussain Raja, CJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2022 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court High Court (AJ&K)
Bench Members Sadaqat Hussain Raja, CJ
Parties ANWAR MEHMOOD Versus SHAKEEL QADIR, CHIEF SECRETARY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR and 2 others
Primary Law Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2022 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2022 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court (AJ&K) bench comprising: Sadaqat Hussain Raja, CJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2022 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ANWAR MEHMOOD Versus SHAKEEL QADIR, CHIEF SECRETARY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974)

Representation

  • Haroon Riaz Mughal for Petitioner-Applicant.

Headnotes / Summary

Art.44

Writ petition

Writ of prohibition

Removal of civil servant by Election Commission

Scope

Petitioner sought issuance of a writ of prohibition directing the respondents not to cancel his appointment notification but he was removed from service during pendency of the petition

Validity

Election Commission was bound to conduct free, fair and transparent elections

Executive was bound to assist the Election Commission in that regard

Election Commission was an independent authority but its powers did not allow it to encroach the jurisdiction of other organs

Notification whereby petitioner was removed from his office clearly amounted to encroachment in the jurisdiction of the High Court and was also ultra vires the Constitution

High Court observed that since the authorities had already withdrawn the impugned notification, therefore, no further deliberation was required

Writ petition was disposed of accordingly. A.A.G. for Official Respondents.

Judgment & Decree

SADAQAT HUSSAIN RAJA, CJ.

Through the above titled Writ Petition No.1795/2021 filed under Article 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution, 1974, a prohibition is sought to the respondents not to cancel the appointment notification of the petitioner dated 30.09.2020, whereby the petitioner-applicant has been appointed as Director General Mirpur Development Authority, Mirpur Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The learned counsel for the petitioner also moved an application for ad-interim relief. This Court, vide order dated 28.05.2021 issued the status quo order in favour of the petitioner. The aforesaid order was served upon the non-applicants and during pendency of the writ petition, the non-applicants issued a notification in pursuance of direction of the Election Commission, whereby the applicant was removed from his office in presence of status quo order of this Court. The applicant also filed an application for initiating contempt proceedings against the non-applicants and after filing of the aforesaid application, the non-applicants cancelled the impugned notification, whereby the applicant was removed from his office. I have perused the impugned notification passed by the official respondents, heard the learned counsel for the parties as well as Legal Advisor for the Election Commission. It is the duty of the Election Commission to conduct free, fair and transparent elections according to Article 50(18) of the Interim Constitution, 1974. The executive is duty bound to assist the Election Commission in this regard. Unfortunately, the aforesaid Article has been misconceived by the Election Commission and other machinery of the State. The whole system is regulated by the Interim Constitution, 1974, the law and rules made thereunder. According to Article 12 of the Interim Constitution, 1974, the executive authority shall be exercised in the name of the President by the Government, consisting of Prime Minister and Ministers, which shall act through Prime Minister. Article 12 of the Interim Constitution, 1974, is hereby reproduced as under:- "

12. The Government:- (1) The executive authority of Azad Jammu and Kashmir shall be exercised in the name of the President by the Government, consisting of the Prime Minister and the Ministers, which shall act through the Prime Minister who shall be the Chief Executive of Azad Jammu and Kashmir; (2). In the performance of his functions under the Constitution, the Prime Minister may act either directly or through the Ministers. (3). The Prime Minister and the Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the Assembly." (Underlining is mine) Under Article 12(4), the Government may make Rules for convenient transaction of its business. Sub-Article (5) of the same Rule empowers the Government to delegate any of its functions to the officers or authority subordinate to it. Articles 12(4) and 5 of the Interim Constitution, 1974 are reproduced as under:- "12(4). Orders and other instruments made and executed in the name of President shall be authenticated in such manner as may be specified in rules to be made by the Government, and the validity of an order or instrument which is so authenticated shall not be called in question on the ground that it is not an order or instrument made or executed by the President. (5) The Government may regulate the allocation and transaction of its business and may for the convenient transaction of that business delegate any of its functions to officers or authorities subordinate to it." Similarly, Rule 10 of the Rules of Business, provides that the Prime Minister is head of the Cabinet and also responsible for all the policy matters. Rule 10 of the Rules of Business is also reproduced as under:- "

10. Orders, Instructions, Agreements and contracts: (1) All executive actions of Government shall be expressed to be taken in the name of the President. (2). Save in cases where an officer has been specifically empowered to sign an order or instrument of Government, every such order or instrument shall be signed by the Secretary, the Additional Secretary [Joint Secretary], [the Deputy Secretary], [the Under Secretary], the Section Officer to Government or the officer on Special Duty in the Department concerned, and such signature shall be deemed to be proper authentication of such order or instrument. (3) Instruction for the making of contracts on behalf of the President and the execution of the such contracts and all assurance of property shall be issued by the [Law, Justice, and Parliamentary Affairs Department], According to the Rules of Business, no order shall be issued without approval of the Prime Minister in cases enumerated in III Schedule. Rule 5(2) of Rules of Business provides procedure for correspondence between the head of attached Department. The same is reproduced as under:- "

5. Functions of Prime Minster: (1) The Prime Minister shall; (a). ___________________________ (b).____________________________ (c).____________________________ (d).___________________________ (2). No order shall be issued without the approval of the Prime Minister in cases enumerated in Schedule III." No doubt, Election Commission is an independent authority for free, fair and transparent Elections but these powers do not allow to encroach in the jurisdiction of other organs. It is century old maxim that "you cannot rob Paul to pay Peter". Hence, according to the Constitution and Rules of Business, Election Commission is not empowered to encroach in the sphere of other organ which is not warranted by law. The notification whereby the applicant was removed from his office clearly amounts encroachment in the jurisdiction of the Court and also ultra-vires to the Constitution and law, hence, it is necessary for the Election Commission to follow Constitutional Provisions as well as the Rules of Business. It is pertinent to mention here that in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the Interim Constitution is in field and the Government is also functional. All the organs of the State i.e Judiciary, executive and legislature are functioning in accordance against the law is not maintainable. The authorities have withdrawn the Notification, therefore, no further deliberation is required. However, the observations made in the order shall be followed strictly by the concerned authorities. In the light of what has been stated above, the contempt application stands consigned to record. SA/8/AJK (HC) Order accordingly.