1996 PLP 87 (PLC)
THE PUNJAB CLUB, LAHORE Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE and another
| Citation | 1996 PLP 87 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J |
| Parties | THE PUNJAB CLUB, LAHORE Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE and another |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996 PLP 87 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996 PLP 87 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1996 PLP 87 (PLC) (THE PUNJAB CLUB, LAHORE Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khalid Mahmood Pasha for Petitioner.
- Rana Muhammad Arshad, Addl. A: G. (Ph.) for Respondent No.1 Maqbool Elahi Malik, A: G. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 22nd December, 1992.
- 6. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Unfortunately, although at one stage the learned counsel for respondent No.2 has appeared but thereafter he absented himself and no argument was addressed on behalf of the said respondent by any one. In view of the importance of the question involved. I had called upon Mr. Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate‑General, Punjab, Mr. Asadullah Siddiqui, Mr. Aftab Ahmad Khan and Mr. M. Asghar Malik, to assist this Court in resolving this controversy. I am grateful for the valuable assistance rendered by them.
- 10. All the learned counsel appearing as amices curiae also took the same view, except Mr. M. Asghar Malik, Advocate.
- 11. Mr. M. Asghar Malik, Advocate, who has referred to the definitions of `Industry as appearing in various enactments in Pakistan and abroad. The learned counsel emphasized that if material services are provided by an organization even to its members, it would be an industry. He maintained that the word `service' in the context of an industry has wide connotation and has received judicial interpretation. The learned counsel placed heavy reliance on certain decisions from Indian jurisdiction.
- 12. Mr. Aftab Ahmad Khan, Advocate, has correctly pointed out that the Indian cases are not of much relevance as the definition of `industry' under the Indian laws is different from that appearing in the Indus Relations Ordinance, 1969. In this context it may be pointed out that the ‑definition of `industry' as originally enacted in section 2(xiv) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, was differently worded and specifically included undertaking. However, by Ordinance XIX of 1970, the definition of `industry' was substituted and apart from other change word `undertaking' was specifically deleted. The judgments of the Indian Supreme Court in The Secretary Madras Gymkhana Club Employees Union v. The Management of the Gymkhana Club AIR 1968 SC 554 and Cricket Club of India v. Bombay Labour Union and another AIR 1969 SC 276, proceeded to hold clubs as `industry' as being an `undertaking'. This reasoning is, however, not applicable in our country after the deletion of word `undertaking' by amending Ordinance No. XIX of 1970 from the definition of `industry'.
- On an analysis of the above definitions, it will appear that a `club' is generally understood not as a commercial or industrial organization but is in the nature of a second home to its members. It is especially so in the case of a private club. The income which the club generates is from contributions of its members and is not an outcome of any business activity. The services being rendered by the club are confined to its members and are more in the nature of those which are enjoyed by a person in his own house. No services are rendered by a Club to the public in general or to the community at large or even a section thereof. It is, therefore, difficult to agree with Mr. M. Asghar Malk Advocate, that merely because material services are being provided by a club it should be considered as an industry".
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 2(xiv) & 7(2)
Club is generally understood not as a commercial or industrial organization, but as in the nature of second home of its members and it was especially so in the case of a private club
Income which club generates is from contribution of its members and is not an outcome of any business activity
Services rendered by the club are confined to its members and are more in the nature of those which are enjoyed by a person in his own house
No services were rendered by a "club" to the public in general or to the community at large or even a section thereof-- Merely because material services were provided by a club, it could not be considered as an "industry"
Petitioner club, thus could not be regarded to be an "industry" within meaning of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and as such trade union formed by its employees would not qualify for registration in view of S.7(2) of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. KG. Old, Principal, Christian Technical Training Centre, Gujranwala v. Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court, Northern Zone and 6 others PLD 1976 Lah. 1097; Lahore Development Authority and others v. Abdul Shafiq and others 1992 PLC 1214; Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Gujranwala through Chairman v. Registrar of Trade Unions, Gujranwala and another 1993 PLC 475; The Secretary Madras Gymkhana Club Employees' Union v. The Management of the Gymkhana Club AIR 1968 SC 554; Cricket Club of India v. Bombay Labour Union and another AIR 1969 SC 276 and Rawalpindi Club, Rawalpindi v. Registrar of Trade Unions and 2 others 1989 PLC 760 ref. Asadullah Siddiqui, Aftab Ahmad Khan and M. Asghar Malik as Amicus curiae.
Judgment & Decree
12. Mr. Aftab Ahmad Khan, Advocate, has correctly pointed out that the Indian cases are not of much relevance as the definition of `industry' under the Indian laws is different from that appearing in the Indus Relations Ordinance, 1969. In this context it may be pointed out that the ‑definition of `industry' as originally enacted in section 2(xiv) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, was differently worded and specifically included undertaking. However, by Ordinance XIX of 1970, the definition of `industry' was substituted and apart from other change word `undertaking' was specifically deleted. The judgments of the Indian Supreme Court in The Secretary Madras Gymkhana Club Employees Union v. The Management of the Gymkhana Club AIR 1968 SC 554 and Cricket Club of India v. Bombay Labour Union and another AIR 1969 SC 276, proceeded to hold clubs as `industry' as being an `undertaking'. This reasoning is, however, not applicable in our country after the deletion of word `undertaking' by amending Ordinance No. XIX of 1970 from the definition of `industry'.
13. The question as to whether club is an industry was considered by this Court in Rawalpindi Club, Rawalpindi v. Registrar of Trade Unions and 2 others 1989 PLC .760, which was a case relating to Rawalpindi Gymkhana, in which it was held to be not an industry as the facilities pr6vided by it there limited to the members of the Club. I am not persuaded to take a different view.
14. In order to resolve the, controversy involved in this petition, it is necessary to understand as to what exactly is a club. In Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition at page 232, a club is defined as:‑‑ "A voluntary, incorporated or un-corporated association of persons for common purposes of a social, literary, investment, political nature, or the like. Association of persons for promotion of some common object, such as literature, science, politics, good fellowship, etc. especially one jointly supported and meeting periodically, and membership is usually conferred by ballot and carries privilege of exclusive use of club quarters, and word also applies to a building apartment or room occupied by a club." Similarly, in Ballentine's Law Dictionary, Third Edition at page 211, following definition of club appears:‑ "An association or organization of persons who meet together for the purpose of social intercourse or some common object such as the pursuit of literature, science, politics, art, and athletic pursuits or sports, such as swimming, tennis, and golf. United Cerebral Palsy Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 382 Pa. 67, 114 A2d, 331, 52 ALR 2d 1093."
15. Volume 6 American Jurisprudence at page 432, defines club as:‑‑ "The word `club' has no precise meaning. It derives from the Anglo Saxon `clcofan', meaning uniting to divide, and usually indicates a division of reckoning. As commonly understood, a `club' is merely an organization or association of persons who meet or live together for the purpose of social intercourse or some other common object such as the pursuit of literature, science, politics, or good fellowship. Clubs are formed for all sorts of purposes, and there is no uniformity in their constitutions and rules. It is well‑known that clubs exist which limit the number of their members and select them with great care, own considerable property, furnish food and drink to the members for money, and afford sleeping quarters and recreational activities as ordinary adjunts. Clubs may be either incorporated or unincorporated, and in this article both kinds are discussed. Social clubs are sometimes organized as corporations, but even when they are created under the statute, their functions, which are intended to be purely social, remain unchanged. They are generally regarded, in morals and in law, as free from condemnation, and even censure, when organized in good faith and conducted in accordance with what was, intended by the law‑making power of the State in authorizing their incorporation. But where the charter of such an organization is fraudulently obtained for the purpose of evading some law of the state, it will be revoked."
16. In Halsbury's Laws of England (Fourth Edition), Vol. 6, paragraph 201 at page 56, it is stated :‑‑ "A club, except a proprietary club or an investment club, may be defined as a society of persons associated together, not for the purposes of trade, but for social reasons, the promotion of politics, sport, art, science or literature, or for any other lawful purpose; but trading activities will not destroy the nature of a club if they are merely incidental to the club's purposes. The association must be private and have some element of permanence. The purposes for which a club exists may be altered or modified, and there is no rule of law which, requires a club to fulfil each and every separate purpose for which it was originally formed. Once the mutual assent of the members has been secured, the doctrine of ultra vires has no place with respect to the activities of such an association.: S
17. In Corpus Juris Secundum, Volume 14 at page 1279, club is defined as under:‑‑ "A club is a voluntary association of persons for purposes of a social, literary, or political nature, or the li0ke. While the word `club' has no very definite meaning, it may be defined generally as a voluntary association .of persons for purposes of a social, literary, or political nature, or the like. A dub is a definite association organized for an indefinite existence; not an ephemeral meeting for a particular occasion, to be lost in a crowd at its dissolution. There are various kinds of clubs. An unincorporated members' dub is a society of persons each of whom contributes to the funds out of which the expenses of conducting the society are paid. An unincorporated proprietary club is one whose property and funds belong to proprietor who usually conducts it with a view to profit; the members, in consideration of the payment by them to the proprietor of entrance fees and subscriptions, are entitled to make such use of the premises and property, and to exercise such other rights and privileges, as the contract between them and the proprietor justifies. Beneficial associations generally are considered in the title beneficial association pp.l‑
86. Employee's relief and benefit associations are discussed in the C.J.S. title Master and Servant pp.167‑170, also 39 CJ. 247 note 65‑p.259 note
26. Unincorporated associations generally are considered in the title Association pp.l‑
39. According to Words and Phrases Permanent Edition, Volume 7‑A dub inter alia means:‑‑ 'A club is an association of individuals for pleasure or profit. Margin v. State 59 Ala. 34."
18. In the Aiyar's Judicial Dictionary (Eleventh Edition) at page 261, club is defined as:‑‑ "Club, Club‑house Association to which individuals subscribe for purpose of mutual entertainment and convenience. It is not a Company, a partnership or even a collection of co‑owners. The affairs of a club are generally conducted by a steward or secretary, who acts under the immediate superintendence of a Committee. The members of a club, merely as such, are not liable for debts incurred by the Committee for work done or goods supplied to the dub. The Courts will not ordinarily interfere with the decision of the dub expelling a member, if such a decision had been arrived at bona fide and in accordance with the rules of the club. (Comportz v. Cold‑ingham 9 Mad. 31‑9)."'
19. In the Stroud's Judicial Dictionary, Fourth Edition at page 488, following definition of club appears:‑‑ "In Australia the following definition has been given: A club is "a voluntary association of a number of persons meeting together for purposes mainly social, each contributing a certain sum either to a common fund for the benefit of the members or to a particular individual for his own benefit. (per Latham, C.J. in Bennett v. Cooper 76 CLR 570). A dub is not a justice entity: See Re Hardy, 48 N.S.W.S.R.133." On an analysis of the above definitions, it will appear that a `club' is generally understood not as a commercial or industrial organization but is in the nature of a second home to its members. It is especially so in the case of a private club. The income which the club generates is from contributions of its members and is not an outcome of any business activity. The services being rendered by the club are confined to its members and are more in the nature of those which are enjoyed by a person in his own house. No services are rendered by a Club to the public in general or to the community at large or even a section thereof. It is, therefore, difficult to agree with Mr. M. Asghar Malk Advocate, that merely because material services are being provided by a club it should be considered as an industry".
20. It stands admitted in the written statement and is evident from the documents filed by the parties that Punjab Club is an association limited by guarantee and was originally registered under section 36 of Act,' 1887. According to Memorandum and Articles of Association, the facilities provided by the dub are restricted to its members. The membership is regulated by the provisions contained in the Articles of Association, which would show that the club is in the nature of a private club and the rights of admission to which are reserved.
21. It emerges from the foregoing discussion that Punjab Club cannot be regarded to be an "industry" within the meaning of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, and as such trade union formed by its employees did not qualify for registration, in view of section 7(2) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. For the reasons aforesaid, this petition is allowed and the registration of respondent No.2 as a trade union is declared without lawful authority and of no legal effect. There shall be, no orders as to costs. H.B.T./A‑902/L Petition allowed.